Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13470)	11/6/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Daniel - the relevance of your irrelevance is relevantly irrelevant. Now that we know you condone and support criminal behavior in the White House, your hypocrisy in attempting to smear every other president in the history of the nation is truly relevant to pointing out how lame you are as a defender. Submit your resignation to your boss, Carville, and get a real day job. Mr. K.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13470)	11/6/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

blah, blah, blah Humorless, redundant, irrelevant bs. JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (13470)	11/8/1998 4:58:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The Iran contra investigation lasted longer and produced 3 convictions not overturned. Whitewater,etc..., has lasted years shy at this point of Iran Contra, and has something in the teens I think, for convictions not overturned. Hmmm... . The Reagan/Bush Whitehouses turned over everything asked of them by the Special Prosecutor quickly, with not a single battle over documents. The bottom line is that like the early days of Watergate, when the front pages almost weekly headlined new evidence and speculations, Nixon still enjoyed 70% approval ratings 'til the smoking gun came out. Now, the Clinton whitehouse behaves very much like the Nixon whitehouse when it comes to producing documents. Many folks were very sure Nixon was guilty- and were proven right. Now many are sure Clinton is guilty- and the circumstantial evidence, just as in the case of Nixon, is a mountain! The only difference thus far is the lack of the smoking gun to date- save the Jones injustice/pertinent Lewinsky evidence miasma(what a putz Clinton is- he's charged to admit he requested an unrequited BJ from Jones, and he expects us to believe he didn't think "sex" as defined in THAT CASE, would cover requesting- with a sly glance down there- a Lewinsky BJ-HA HA HA!-as a caller on the tube said the other day, he's our Pee Wee Herman President! Only worse- because he runs around calling otherwise decent sexually consenting citizens liars when HE is the liar on the subject!). Clinton is almost certainly guilty of most of the other charges against him, but his wife learned well the lessons of Nixon- don't let the evidence out!