SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/10/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: surelock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Auric,
I've been lurking for a few weeks, just getting to know the
SI terrain. My current primary area of interest is in
exposing highly over-valued companies, preferably companies
with minimal sales, no earnings, run by individuals with
little or no track record. The more outlandish their
new widgets are, the better.
When these kinds of companies achieve loftly valuations, it is
usually only a matter of time before they self-destruct.
Here is one for consideration:
Lotus Pacific Inc. (LPFC OTC Bulletin Board)
1) The company has 47.3 million shares issued, not including 8
million warrants (strike price $3.00) and 1.09 million director options (strike price $6.00), along with 4,300 series A preferred
(any conversion terms unknown).

2) Of the above, 8 million were issued to insiders and associates for
cash consideration of $.001/share (not a typo!), 18 million issued for $.01/share, 10 million issued for $.50/share, and 3.1 issued for $1.00/share.

3) The company is a holding company for two subsidiaries
LPF International
is in the textile and apparel business, with sales of $4.8 million
and a net income of $90,000 for the year ending June 30, 1998.
Regent Electronics
has two primary products:
Wonder TV A6000, which, to quote the company (form 10KSB, filed with
sec on Sep 11, 1997)is an "all-in-one box system with combined
functions of a multimedia personal computer, a fax machine, a Karaoke
machine, an Internet box, an audio CD player, and an electronic game
machine". Patents pending in China.
Its other product, the TeleWeb system, is a "WWW broadcasting system to send the Internet contents and selected commercial information through existing cable TV networks". (source: form 10KSB filed Oct. 1 1998)Regent is also planning to enter the on-line arena in China,
with various plans for retail services and electronic commerce.
Regent lost $1.67 million last year on sales of $6.1 million.

4)Does anyone read the sec filings at Edgar? If so, they would read
about various strange non-arms-length transactions between insiders,
LPFC, and their subsidiary companies. For example, did you know that LPFC sold an interest in Rightiming Electronics on May 6, 1997, only to turn around and buy control of it on June 3, 1997 for $5 million, and 8 million shares of Regent?

5)The company had cash of $3.1 million at year end June 30, 1998, but
with 47 employees and various independent contractors and temporary
employees, and negative cash flow, it likely won't be long before the company does a further dilutive financing, or insiders start cashing existing options and warrants that are well in-the-money.

6)LPFC was a shell company which changed hands on January 28, 1997, and on that date James Yao, James Liu, and David Leung became executives and directors.
Did you know that three gentlemen with strikingly similar names (Albert Yao, Chen Liu, and David Leung) were directors of a Vancouver Stock Exchange company called Seacorp Properties? Seacorp (SEK.V) was delisted from the Vancouver Exchange on March 2, 1998 for non-payment of fees, last trade at $.03.

7) To my knowledge, the company has never issued a press release.

8) Just before the close today, the stock rocketed up over $3 on
light volume.

9) LPFC: fully diluted market cap is $644 million.

Any thoughts?

Surelock Homes





























To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/10/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: surelock  Respond to of 19428
 
Auric,
Here's one more for you to consider. Have a look at a company
called World Star Asia (WSAS OTC Bulletin Board). This is a
shell company, nothing more. On May 8, 1998, they announced
that they had entered into negotiations to acquire an American
direct marketing company. This deal was canceled on June 18,
along with a proposed $.05/share financing. The same day, they
announced that they were entering into a binding letter of intent
to buy CBN World Star Incorporated, which holds the sub-license
to build factories in the Philippines for the production of the
WorldStar Utility Vehicle. This vehicle is "rugged, inexpensive, and
specifically designed for the developing nations of the world."
I'll spare you from further detail, because this deal was also
canceled on Nov. 4, along with another proposed financing of
2.5 million units priced at $.05.
Shareholders must be absolutely thrilled that this latest deal
has been canceled, as they have bid the shares up from the $1.00
area to todays close of $5.50. Yesterday, a release which, among
other things, said "The company currently is a development stage company and has no business operations at this time. The company
is in the process of looking for a viable business opportunity. Further information will be released as matters develop."
They are also proposing a three new for one old share split,
which will result in the currently issued 2.8 million shares
becoming 8.4 million.
Curious about what their plans may be for this shell with a
market cap of $15 million, I phoned the company. The number
listed at the bottom of their release rings into a barber shop
in Vancouver. The barber was not in.

Surelock Homes




To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/11/1998 12:24:00 PM
From: hawk-eye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
what do you mean by "boxed"???????
please explain....



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/12/1998 9:30:00 AM
From: TRIIBoy  Respond to of 19428
 
exchange2000.com




To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/12/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 19428
 
SRCM Conf Call Info....

Here is the number for people who want to ask questions - if you do not dial this number you may not be able to ask questions...

1 800 618-6990

In case you need ideas for questions on the SRCM conf call here are a few I thought up but likely won't get the chance to ask before they cut me off...

Feel free to use them...

1. QUESTION: What are your plans to raise more money?

2. QUESTION: What restrictions does the 100 million bond debt place on your ability to raise additional money?

3. QUESTION: How many customers have you lost to IMS?

(this is a list of just some of the customers they lost)

US West;
Great Western Directories;
TDI;
Southern Directories;
Tele Direct (Bell Canada);
Telus;
Feist Publishing;
Sunshine Directories

Page 16 of 98 Q1:

As a result of the October 1997 Brite and VNN Acquisitions, the Company has experienced growth in its revenues, gross margins, and operating expenses.

It went on to say you :

{the company} “expects that cash used in operations will decline as a result of the October 1997 Acquisitions...”

QUESTION: When did you lost the US West Contract? (it was lost first part of Q1)

QUESTION: why was the loss not disclosed in Q1?

4. With great fanfare on July 28, 1998 you announced that you would be deploying your Interactive Channel Service on Insight Communication's new digital TV platform.

In a recent cable industry magazine article, (Broadcast Wire and Cable). John Reed was quoted as saying SRCM has no written agreement defining what SRCM will get paid for this venture with Insight.

QUESTION: How can you have an agreement with Insight Communications if 3 MONTHS AFTER YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT you don't have an agreement defining what you will be paid?

QUESTION: There seems to be a great deal of confusion as to what you might be rolling out with Insight Communications. Since you do not have anything more than a Beta of your Virtual modem internet access product - do you expect to do a full roll out with a beta product?





To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (667)11/17/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Moominoid  Respond to of 19428
 
I've found PPOD to be a great trading stock. Do you have any insights on the reasons for the huge volatility?

David