Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearded One who wrote (21275)	11/8/1998 2:03:00 AM
From: ed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

First , let me make it clear to you , it has been proved it is real player's problem which made its own product not compatable with win95. Secondly, it is Apple who did not want to try out the compatability of the quicktime with win95 before release for confidential reasons. I think you understand that before you release a new software products to the market , you try thousands of times to make sure the software works, that what we call QA. Unless Apple did not have a qualified QA procedure for its newly released products , I do not understand why this bug of compability was not caught before the release. Unless, all the products Apple released are just junk !!!!! CPQ already said it very clear that the reason CPQ decided not to OEM the quicktime is because APPLE wanted CPQ to pay royalty , while CPQ had other choice. As to APPLE, first you do not have a solid evidence to prove that Microsoft force APPLE not to carry Navigator, secondly, thinking of APPLE's small market share , it really did not count much at all. You just have too much prejudice without any logic and evidence.