Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (14061)	11/9/1998 3:23:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>Yeah, right! Which is more crooked -- having an extra-marital affair and trying to hide it? Or waxing eloquent about "family values" and then fighting tooth-and-nail to prevent the Family Medical Leave Act from becoming law?< It depends upon why one waxed eloquent about "family values" and then fought tooth-and-nail to prevent the Family Medical Leave Act from becoming law. The Family Medical Leave Act is not a principle, but a mere piece of legislation. It may have presented ramifications contradicting the good principles of the person voting against it. On the other hand honesty is a principle, and when one has an extra-marital affair, one breaks the principle. When one tries to hide it, one breaks the principle yet again. >While I would be not get all enthusiastic in supporting the behavior of a lecherous person, I still will vote for him any day, were my choice only between he and the hideous hypocrisy of most of the Republicans.< Your married lecher is by definition hideously hypocritical. On the other hand one can have moral recourse to vote against a piece legislation.