SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8414)11/11/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Tim Hall  Respond to of 14226
 
Richard,

If they are pumping water out of an old mine and discharging it after the resin columns, without a permit or permission, they are in big trouble. I suspect they are placing it back in the mine so it can dissolve more gold and platinum. I also hope they are using a pump powered by a surplus photo-voltaic cell or their pumping costs will probably exceed their income. VBG



To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (8414)11/11/1998 4:24:00 PM
From: Scott Wheeler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14226
 
Richard, when I was a kid growing up in the tropics, we used to play
around the salt flats. They let in seawater and then allowed the ponds
to evaporate until salt crystals formed, and raked up the crystals in
piles to dry. While raking won't work for metals extraction at OG,
perhaps concentration by pond evaporation can. The energy use for concentrating the leachate is free, and the pond can simply be replenished by pump as needed. While evaporation will occur anytime
during the year in AZ, it would be especially productive in the warmer months. I am only thinking aloud here, and have no idea how concentrated it ought to get before passing thru the columns, but costs should be much less than the ore-leaching methods. So even if the yields are small, it still could contribute to the bottom line.
Any hydrologists out there know how much can evaporate from a pond
X by Y for Z days?