SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (14663)11/12/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 67261
 
<<I wager this will be a controversial statement.>> I don't gamble.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (14663)11/12/1998 3:40:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
But LRR, brees is religious himself...What are you arguing about here?

And you're not that easy to follow, either...:-))

jbe



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (14663)11/12/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: mrknowitall  Respond to of 67261
 
Welcome!

Mr. K.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (14663)11/12/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<...then the "self-determination" is a chimera.>>

Academically self-determination involves making choices to manage resources toward goal achievement. Even if the goal is non-involvement in something. I did not mean to imply any omnipotence in the decision making. Of course, there are all kinds of forces we don't control that effect us in our life and living. Self-determination also involves responding to forces we don't control. We do have free will. Religious as well as non-religious folk support that notion. Destiny is another issue. Self-determination in a broader sense leaves lots of room for interesting discussion.

<<In l'affaire Clinton, we often see our core ethics expressed in how we stand on the issue. Moralists wanna see the guy's arse kicked early&often. Progressives wanna see the Republican opposition discredited and punished for sensationalizing a side issue. >>

The bad guys want to see the mask pulled of the lone ranger. Both sides of this issue thing they are riding Tonto's horse.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (14663)11/13/1998 1:31:00 AM
From: pezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<In l'affaire Clinton we often see our core ethics expressed in how we stand on the issue. Moralists wanna see the guys arse kicked early & often.Progresses wanna see the Republican opposition discredited and punished for sensationalizing a side issue>> Egad! you have accurately summed up all 14,000 posts in three lines.
pez