Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ~digs who wrote (31131)	11/12/1998 8:09:00 PM
From: Hound	Respond to of 50264

nice post.

To: ~digs who wrote (31131)	11/12/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: Moosie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

I found four, good post ~protege. dumb old moosie

To: ~digs who wrote (31131)	11/15/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: paulmcg0	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 50264

Today's Web link that describes the kind of behavior seen on this thread, on Fortune magazine's site: pathfinder.com Here's a sample from the article: "most active message boards generally turn into giant cheerleading sessions that have little tolerance for anybody who dares to suggest that a company might be facing trouble." You can attack me, and claim that my postings aren't relevant. I would argue that my messages are at least as relevant as those blindly optimistic posts and hyping here, that has nothing to back it up. Face the facts -- a lot of people have lost money on DGIV, there is no hard information (such as audited financials or proof of any contracts), nothing seems to be happening with the company, the share price has collapsed, and DGIV is going nowhere!

To: ~digs who wrote (31131)	11/18/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: paulmcg0	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 50264

Since people want to focus back on DGIV, I will discuss something from the previous posting. Yes, Liberty Capital has been accused, by the SEC, of promoting microcap stocks like DGIV, without disclosing the fact that they were paid for it. The link for the SEC release on this is sec.gov . As to the question as to why it is relevant, you have to ask another question. Why has Digitcom hired at least 3 different stock promoters that I can identify to push the stock? It gives the appearance that their main business is not VoIP telephony as claimed, but peddling stock. If the company actually had something, why would they have to pay promoters to push the stock? Other people on Wall Street would have already discovered this and they wouldn't need paid promotion. Personally, despite what you claim about the Stock Detective (which is really just one guy running stockdetective.com ), I think they provide a useful consumer service by warning about dubious companies, promoters, and tricks of the microcap stock fraud field. If people had paid attention when the SD warned about Digitcom, perhaps their losses would not have been so high.