Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Josef Svejk who wrote (961)	11/14/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1754

Joey boy- "...why is it that the "large high tech corporation in British Columbia" is not named? Is there a reason it is not named?..." Good and legitimate questions.... The reasons for not disclosing information may be manifold...(legal????). However, I have rephrased your questions as follows and have forwarded them to Greg Kraft for a reply. I will post the reply when I receive it. In the 9/11/98 press release, Mr. Romanica current place of residence is described as a "large high tech corporation". Can you please tell me the name and more about this corporation? Are there any reasons why this company's name wasn't included in the press release? Regarding competition, as has been noted in my and other people's previous posts, questions have been posed to you but never answered about the viability of the product and the market. Here are some of those questions again. How large is the market? How many products can the market support? Is this a good product? How much market share must be gotten to be profitable? Is this particular product being effectively marketed to generate market share? According to my calculations based on PINC's revenue projections, PINC generates significant revenues (and becomes profitable) from this market with less than 2% penetration. Now rather than refute my just made statement, please answer the questions above about the market and offer an analysis of your own about market share. z

To: Josef Svejk who wrote (961)	11/14/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 1754

Oops Joey: Forgot a point regarding your post. PINC has been "obscure" previously and I have taken note of it as well. See my post Message 5257955 PINC subsequently provided additional information that at least stated what university he was formerly dean of plus additional information regarding his experience as follows. John Kendall - Director Dr. Kendall, a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Physics and a professional engineer, was previously Dean of Science at the University of Calgary, Canada. He has had extensive consulting experience, consulting to such entities as the Governments of Great Britain, Canada, and the Peoples Republic of China, the British Admiralty, the World Bank, RevenueCanada, PetroCanada, Imperial Oil and LSI Logic of Canada. Dr. Kendall has won a number of teaching awards, has been awarded three patents, and has authored over 60 referenced papers as well as three books. Now why didn't PINC provide this information previously? Could there be legal reasons for non disclosure? Should we raise a red flag before asking any questions seeking clarification? To do so is a bit irresponsible or shall I say "pre-mature". z