SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (41503)11/15/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574069
 
Elmer <and I don't believe either Intel or AMD fall into this category.> So you know nothing about the current
state at AMD nor Intel. Period.

<testing of the BSB at full processor frequencies ...
would exceed the timing specification ...
of any production tester on the market,
making [K7] unmanufacturable>
What makes you continue to think that the BSB runs
at frequencies you so afraid of? AMD seems to be
clear that they are going to use third-party
SRAMs. Do you know of a 700MHz SRAM on the market?

<but this is the AMD thread and hype is more important than facts.> Facts? What facts have your ever posted here?
FUD yes, but facts - I don't recall a single in
your posts, only intentional FUD. Remember?
"Talent is leaving AMD..." while it appears
that the truth is quite opposite - the best
DEC engineers are working for AMD and against
Intel.

<Incidentally, Rambus poses many of the same problems with a data rate of 800mhz, but that's another story....>
Aha, interesting! Why would the Rambus be another
story? Judging by your bin sort description,
your expertise here is quite similar to
P.Engel's "expertise" in computers - at
1985' level...



To: Elmer who wrote (41503)11/15/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 1574069
 
Elmer, >>>Again refering to
the K7 because it is such a good example, testing of the BSB at full processor
frequencies would require a guardband that would exceed the timing specification
itself as well as the accuracy of any production tester on the market, making it in
effect untestable, and therefore by conventional methods, unmanufacturable...<<<

Sounds like some parameters can't be guardband tested at room only. Need still there to go to high, and sometimes low temp also. Must keep those test engineers up nights!

>>>Anyone
who is doing room temperature only testing is making a major quality compromise
and I don't believe either Intel or AMD fall into this category.<<<

Sounds like you have a good amount of respect for the integrity of the testing philosophy at both Intel and AMD.

Tony



To: Elmer who wrote (41503)11/15/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574069
 
Elmer,

Incidentally, Rambus poses many of the same problems with a data rate of 800mhz, but that's another story....

Perhaps you should elaborate on this. You have suggested that it will be impossible to test the K7 bus, yet the Intel/Rambus problem sounds far more serious.

Scumbria



To: Elmer who wrote (41503)11/15/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574069
 
Elmer,

Nice description of bin testing......agreed.
Mosts folks do test wafers at hot I believe as well as packaged parts.
Cold testing is non-trivial and messy.

As far as testing BSB you are dead wrong.
Folks like HP have testers that can test at speeds greater than 1Ghz.

Check em out.

Regards,

Kash.