Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ztect who wrote (979)	11/16/1998 1:56:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1754

Humble thanks, ztect, for posting the answers. I presume Jeff will comment on the answers to his questions. Mine was regarding Dwight Romanica, which PINC chose to leave insultingly unanswered: When we first went to put out the NR we had included the name. Dwight asked us to remove it for two reasons. He was (and still is) still working for the company, and he didn't want any idiots bothering him there, or phoning the company to verify his existence. Dwight is giving us the guidance that we need, and is acting on a part time basis with us. He receives no salary (neither do I) and has already targeted three companies for us to acquire. When we are more seasoned (a lot more sales) that will be the timing to bring on a full time CEO. We can't afford one of stature right now. The nay sayers can make mileage out of this all they want to. Quite frankly, I'm sick of responding to every negative that these vigilantes come up with. As a young company we will make, and have made, mistakes. I've got more better things to do then spend an hour at 2:30 AM responding to people. I don't mind when it is someone who owns the stock, but not the vigilantes. So, a questioner asking about a CEO of a company whose Director is involved in another company halted since October 8. for what was supposed to be a 15 day halt, is an idiot, a vigilante, and someone that deserves only derision and haughtily flippant dismissal? OK. I get it. Regarding your comments on my statements about Survive-2000/MBCK, like the above PINC response, fancy dancing but no meat on the bone. I stand by my "second hand hearsay," you construct lovely prose for not disputing it. OK. I get that too. Obviously my case for my reasons for not investing here has been made. Feel free to ignore it, side step it, and dispose of it. After all, as you deftly discovered, Svejk is an imbecile with papers from the military medical board to prove it, dealing in dogs, ugly mongrel monstrosities with fake pedigrees. Looking forward to posting here again when I have more humble questions for the poor PINC folks working their fingers to the bone late at night for, ehm, free. (Plus how many shares?) Cheers, Svejk proofsheet.com