To: Joseph Pareti who wrote (68590 ) 11/16/1998 11:14:00 AM From: Thomas G. Busillo Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
Kurlak fans: from Herb Greenberg's TSC column this morning...Herb on TheStreet: Did Intel Intimidate Kurlak?... Did this really happen?: The buzz after Intel's (INTC:Nasdaq) analyst conference on Friday in California was that the big chip maker did its best to intimidate and humiliate Merrill Lynch's Tom Kurlak, who has been sticking by his guns and not recommending the purchase of Intel as it has steadily climbed. According to several sources, who talked with attendees, Intel CEO Craig Barrett flashed a slide on the screen that showed two Merrill Lynch clients scratching their heads, wondering why they missed the run in the stock. "Appalling," says one hedge fund manager, who says it suggests Intel is too fixated on its stock price. Neither Kurlak nor an Intel spokesman could be reached for comment... Hmmm...I guess the sentence portraying the opposing viewpoint must have slipped due to "bandwidth constraints" over at TSC or something. Could it have possibly looked something like..."Awesome" says one Silicon Investor poster, who says it suggests that Intel knows how to gently poke fun at a bloated ego. "Let's face it. Part of Tom Kurlak's work represents an inappropriate but effective application of the thought B.F. Skinner to the securities market; market-timing is psychological cum economic intimidation aimed at modifying investor behavior. If the allegation is true, their actions were proportional and just... ...and anyway, if they really did want to 'intimidate and humiliate' him, they could have always invited him onstage to receive some kind of bogus award and then pulled a Carrie on him... ...which, arguably, also would be proportional and just" <g>thestreet.com Good trading, Tom