Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (14824)	11/16/1998 12:13:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 34075

Like I said yesterday, one step forward, two steps back. If the Chief is right and BD demanded it be removed, which sounds very logical given their further "emphasis", what we have is an 8k announcing SEC charges, period. Oh, with a little smoke, now I feel confident using that word, to soften the blow, but it seems to have worked if these trades are correct. 12:04:23 0.218 5000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 11:50:16 0.255 5000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 11:01:43 0.220 10000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:55:08 0.255 10000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:53:33 0.250 1700 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:53:27 0.200 10000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:45:10 0.280 5700 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:01:48 0.250 7500 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 10:01:35 0.187 1000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign) 09:58:08 0.255 1000 NASDAQ OTC BBS (foreign)

To: the Chief who wrote (14824)	11/16/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Jon Matz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Damn, I knew the word "significant" was significant! One of the news stories last summer quoted TT as saying the Internet forums speculations forced them to publish Guido's report. No doubt if ever they explain why they deleted the word significant, they'll blame that on our wild speculations also. Since I assume that the "current" lawyers approved the original wording of the last 8K, this will cause even greater delay in the publishing of any other releases. Why? Because they've learned again that they haven't got a clue! Especially if this turns out to be further ammunition for the SEC. The main question regarding this seems to be, "Who initiated the deletion, the SEC, BD&C or MINE?". Facinated, Jon