Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Pacel (PLRP): If NASA likes them, shouldn't we? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry T. who wrote (1784)	11/17/1998 1:51:00 PM
From: Chris O'Keefe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3171

Yes, you should have held longer! Your story about TSIS depressed me (because I think what you said is true), but I like the EAGL story!

To: Terry T. who wrote (1784)	11/17/1998 3:35:00 PM
From: Chris O'Keefe	Respond to of 3171

* OT * I was just looking at the 5-year chart for EAGL. Actually, that would have been a very tough hold psychologically. For over a year that thing was unmerciful in going down, with always a little "tease" up as if the bottom had been found. I do understand why a person would consider selling during that time since the up-trends would never seem to stay that way. It took until 1996 for EAGL to have a +600% year (and regain the losses). Interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing about that one. P.S. If you want to have fun in the other direction, check out the 52-week high/low on STRU. What a tank job (I understand there was a 1000-to-1 rs).