To: *ROSARIO* who wrote (1809 ) 11/18/1998 12:25:00 PM From: Robert B. Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3171
Okay, you called Calkins last week instead of yesterday. It doesn't really matter and I'm not going to waste my time verifying it. My questions are still valid. 1) Why do you post the same thing over and over? Do you have a short-term memory problem? From your post #1722, Nov. 15, 1998 "Calkins also confirmed that the company will produce more than 2.8 million in revenues for the 4th quarter of 98! Calkins also confirmed that his attorney has the aforementioned information in order for him to review prior to the News Release. I expect that the News Release could be on the news-wires with-in 24-48 hours. I added to my position at 8-9 cents based upon our DD, Logic, Facts, and the very low 20 million outstanding shares. We should see a nice pop this week." From your post #1782, Nov. 17, 1998 "Calkins told me October produced record revenues and substantiated the fact that the additional forecasted 2.8 million in revenues will happen by during the next several weeks. He also confirmed that a press release will be on the wires at any time, once his attorney reviews the content." From your post # 1803, Nov. 18, 1998 "I spoke to CALKINGS again this morning. He has confirmed record revenues for October and the 2.8 Million additional revenues over the next several weeks. He also confirmed a news release any day." 2) Why did you have a change of heart about calling Mr. Caulkins and posting the information you get from him? Based on your post below, you are admitting that your posts about speaking with Caulkins are pure speculation and hype. From Patrick's post #1428, Nov.2, 1998 "Rosy, How about you call the CEO and see for yourself how verifiable it is? 703-257-4759." From your post #1431, Nov. 2, 1998 "Sorry Pal, hear say means nothing. Unless it is is writing it is pure speculation and hype. Best regards." 3) Why do you use "we" in the post below. Do you have multiple personalities? Did you listen on the other line while someone else called? Did you get the infomation you posted second-hand? Or did you have a mini-conference call with Caulkins? Please clarify. From you post # 1809, Nov. 18, 1998 "We spoke to Calkins at about 8:10 am, EST. We wanted to confirm the aforementioned because of the continued stock price decline."