To: Jeffrey D who wrote (26434 ) 11/18/1998 1:42:00 PM From: Tony Viola Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
Jeff, >>>"Speaking of Morgan, did you see him on CNBC this morning? I believe, in his own conservative way, he said the bottom has been reached and that due to new technology the DRAM glut was of little concern to him.<<< I saw him, and I agree that he was conservatively, or cautiously positive. Some who listened to the CC said he was noncommital about next year but I didn't think that described the CNBC clip. Mark Haines had obviously been pumped with the buzzy stuff to ask him, WRT what technologies might help propel AMAT faster off the bottom, everywhere from 0.18 micron to Silicon Germanium (SiGe), and copper and 300 mm in between. I think Morgan said 0.18 would be significant for them (should be). He didn't comment on SiGe, said it was kind of early for copper, agreeing with Haines' Intel like comments that it would get quite prominent for 0.12, but probably not for 0.18. I know that IBM and Motorola are talking 0.18 and copper. He said 300 mm was a disappointment, so far, and that spending had been cut back on it at Applied (obviously it had to be also put on the back burner by struggling semi companies). However, he said that if a customer wanted to try to go there, Applied could accommodate. That must be the case, and more so, for copper. Morgan said a couple of times that Applied had the most complete "end to end" (my words) equipment solutions for their customers. This is obvious, but it was used in the context of why they could pull out of the morass (my word) better than anyone. Again, a show of confidence on his part. My first time to see, hear Morgan and I was impressed. He obviously is a chairman/CEO with a strong technical background, and seems quite good all around, in a conservative way, as you say. Tony