SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neal Hopper who wrote (14108)11/18/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: Skiawal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
A couple of comments from 10Q. They secured a $16 million line of credit, $5 million equipment line and $4 million term loan. These loans along with current current cash is expected to last 12 months (ACCORDING TO 10Q SEE BELOW). This is OK as hopefully ADSL deployment will be strong enough to generate profits. However, it would have been better if the amortization schedule on the equipment and term loan was maxed out. Instead the $5 mil. equipment loan is amortized over 4 years and worse, the $4 mil term loan is amortized over 3 years requiring HUGE quarterly payments of $333,333 just for the term loan. THESE HUGE PAYMENTS WILL NOT HELP CASH FLOW. MANAGEMENT DEFINITELY SCEWRED UP HERE BY OBTAINING 3 & 4 YEAR AMORTIZATION SCHEDULES. Longer amortization schedules would have reduced the payments due giving WSTL more flexibility and an easier cash flow under these difficult times. I am sure the bank would have agreed to at least 5 year amortization schedules if not longer...

<At September 30, 1998, the Company's principle sources of liquidity were $25.4
million of cash and short term investments. In October 1998, the Company entered
into a credit facility that replaced the revolving promissory note and equipment
facilities that expired on May 15, 1998 and December 15, 1997, respectively.
Under this credit facility, the Company may borrow up to $16.0 million under a
secured revolving line of credit based upon receivables and inventory levels and
up to an additional $5.0 million under a secured equipment line of credit.
Additionally, a $4.0 million term loan was provided under the credit facility to
refinance existing long term indebtedness with the prior lending institution.
Cash and cash equivalents, anticipated funds from operations, along with
available credit lines and other resources, are expected to be sufficient to
meet cash requirements for the next twelve months.>



To: Neal Hopper who wrote (14108)11/19/1998 2:26:00 AM
From: Trey McAtee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
neal--

screw BLS...they were dumb enough to go to a company withouta DLC solution.

actually, BLS might not be a bad short. i think it may be one of the few companies with management thats even worse than WSTLs<G>.

good luck to all,
trey



To: Neal Hopper who wrote (14108)11/19/1998 7:41:00 AM
From: riposte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
BellSouth to give a taste of DSL.Lite

From NWFusion.com...

By Tim Greene
Network World, 11/18/98


BellSouth next month will run digital subscriber line
(DSL) gear through its paces to find out just what it
takes to offer up easy-to-install broadband Internet
access over regular phone lines.

The carriers will trial DSL hardware that integrates
directly with telephone voice switches made by
Lucent. The point of the exercise is to find out the pros
and cons of handling DSL lines directly on the
switches vs. using a DSL access multiplexer
(DSLAM) in front of the switches.

BellSouth has committed to using DSLAMs made by
Alcatel, but in some circumstances it may make more
sense to have the customer's DSL lines terminate
directly on the shelf of a Lucent 5ESS switch,
according to John Cahill, director of advanced
networking for BellSouth. That will depend on a
variety of circumstances including the type of switch
available near the customer's site.

[REMAINING TEXT DELETED]
FULL TEXT @
nwfusion.com



To: Neal Hopper who wrote (14108)11/23/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: Johnathan C. Doe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21342
 
Wired In to One-Stop Shopping
Jones Takes First Steps in Offering Phone, Cable and Internet
Service

By Paul Farhi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 23, 1998; Page F05

It may be the Holy Grail of consumer telecommunications. For years,
business executives have talked about providing "one-stop shopping" --
offering phone service, cable TV connections and Internet hookups for one
price, and on one monthly bill. AT&T Corp., among others, wants to do it
so much that it's willing to spend $48 billion to acquire a cable company,
Tele-Communications Inc.

But while the concept is attractive, executing it can be hard work. Exhibit
A: Jones Communications' system in Alexandria.

Jones Communications of Maryland Inc., based in Lanham, the biggest
cable TV provider in the Washington area, has been a pioneer in testing
the market validity of one-stop shopping. In June 1996, just four months
after a new federal law permitted it, Jones became the first cable operator
in the country to win state approval to offer local telephone service over its
cable TV lines.

After a $30 million upgrade of its Alexandria system, Jones, a division of
Jones Intercable Inc., headquartered near Denver, began marketing
packages of phone, cable and high-speed Internet access last year.

Raquel Powell, 29, was one of the first to bite. She had been a longtime
cable customer of Jones when the company approached her last January
about providing her phone service. "I was a little hesitant at first because all
I had known was Bell Atlantic," says Powell, a government contract
specialist.

But Jones has performed flawlessly, she says. In 10 months, the only
problem she's experienced has been a billing screw-up -- caused by
AT&T, her long-distance provider, she says. Jones's customer service
representatives even worked with AT&Tto resolve it.

Powell estimates she's saving $10 to $15 per month on her phone bill,
compared with what she used to pay Bell Atlantic. Jones charges $42.80
for combined local phone and expanded basic cable service. The price
includes call waiting, three-way calling and interior wire maintenance, all of
which would cost extra if Powell had remained with Bell Atlantic. Says
Powell, "I'm very pleased."

But here's where this sunny picture starts to get a little cloudy.

Jones can't provide the services Powell gets to just anyone in Alexandria; it
hasn't expanded beyond the city's apartment buildings and other
"multi-family dwelling units" because it's not cost-effective to do so. In fact,
it could be years before cable companies are able to profitably provide
phone connections to single-family households.

And there have been some snafus along the way. Jones has temporarily
suspended signing up customers for one of its services -- high-speed
Internet access -- due to a complicated legal dispute with Bell Canada, a
part-owner of Jones. The company has provided service to those it initially
signed up, but won't take new orders again until January.

In other words, one-stop shopping can be nice, if you can get it.

Two years after it began service, Jones says, it has signed up some 8,000
cable-phone customers or Internet customers in the area. Most of those
are in Alexandria, but the total includes customers in Prince William and
Prince George's counties, where Jones extended phone service and limited
Internet access earlier this year.

To put that figure in context, Jones provides cable-only service to some
430,000 households throughout the region -- which means that only 1.8
percent of its existing customers have signed up for its new phone and
Internet services.

Still, Jones says it is pleased with its progress; its multi-service subscriber
base has more than doubled this year, says Drew Sheckler, Jones's senior
vice president of operations for the region. In buildings where Jones can
provide phone service, he says, some 25 percent of residents have signed
up, a "spectacular" rate, according to Sheckler.

Indeed, the company's major challenge may not be the technological kind,
but the marketing one.

"People don't automatically think of cable as a resource for telephone
services," Sheckler says. "People are used to thinking only about getting
phone service from Bell Atlantic. . . . [But] our experience says that once
we get in front of people -- and I mean that literally, at a [sales] party or
with door-to-door sales -- our [sign-up] rate is very high," up to 80
percent.

At the current rate, Sheckler projects that Jones -- which soon will be
acquired by another cable giant, Comcast Corp. -- will start earning a
profit from its phone-and-Internet businesses by 2002.

But it's not clear whether Jones will be able to sustain its pace, given that
it's not the only one with one-stop-shopping ideas.

Most prominently, Bell Atlantic Corp., which dominates the East Coast
phone market, is aiming to offer its millions of customers Internet access
and video as well as phone service. It recently unveiled a high-speed
Internet access service that competes with those offered by cable
companies, and it markets DirecTV's direct-broadcast satellite television
services to customers.

There are smaller outfits, too, such as Starpower Inc., a venture
part-owned by Potomac Electric Power Co. that has signed agreements to
provide phone, video and Internet services to residents of the District and
Gaithersburg beginning next year. (The company eventually wants to
provide services throughout the Washington area.)

Meanwhile, OnePoint Communications, a privately held firm based in
Washington, has begun selling Bell Atlantic's phone service to complement
the video service it provides to apartment owners on the East Coast.

In January, says the company's president, John Norcutt, OnePoint will
begin offering Internet connections to apartment buildings it serves in the
District and Howard and Prince William counties, taking on Jones directly
in the latter location.

Traditional cable companies such as Jones "have spent the past 20 years
with the mentality of monopolies," says Norcutt. "I think they're a little
more guarded and cautious about rolling out new services. But competition
is coming. That's a reality for all of us."

© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company