SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maxwell who wrote (41838)11/19/1998 8:37:00 AM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572694
 
Maxwell,

You wrote..

>>>Latency on SDRAM is much better than Rambus.

This is what I found in an article- snipped but unadulterated. So do you still think the latency is better in SDRAM? Latency is a problem in all DRAM.

MileHigh
-----------------------------

Even though RDRAM has bigger bandwidth than SDRAM, it
still suffers from a key problem common to all DRAM designs:
latency......<snip>.....

On top of that, is the wait imposed by the system--such as
Direct RDRAM--that transfers that information. Early Direct
RDRAM technology had high latency, but the modern design is
about 10 billionths of a second faster than any other
technology, shipping or planned, Toprani said.



To: Maxwell who wrote (41838)11/19/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: d e conway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572694
 
<< Rambus >>

Doesn't AMD have something going in that department? I think they're working with RMBS, aren't they. Will this tech be incorporated in K7? Anybody got any thoughts on that ?

regards, Dan