SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale J. who wrote (11827)11/19/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Respond to of 64865
 
Article in Internet Week re Microsoft compliance plans
internetwk.com

Thursday, November 19, 1998, 11:00 a.m. ET.

Microsoft Tools Team to
Sun: No Problem

By RICHARD KARPINSKI

Calling this week's preliminary injunction
much narrower than expected, a Microsoft
developer tools manager today said the
vendor would tweak its Java tools to meet
the order but leave in all the platform
technologies it believes Windows
developers want.

"Our initial concerns about this ruling were
a bit exaggerated," said Tom Button,
Microsoft's director of product
management, developer tool. "The ruling is
relatively narrow, and the changes the
judge is requiring of us are relatively
narrow."

While Button officially represents
Microsoft's tools group, he said the
company also planned to support the
changes requested by the judge to Internet
Explorer and the Windows OS.

While the statements are no doubt
designed at least in part to downplay Sun
Microsystems' major court victory, they
nonetheless offer the first word from
Microsoft officials that they plan to meet the
demands of Sun.

Following the court ruling, speculation has
run rampant that Microsoft could be
considering other solutions, such as using
its own so-called "clean-room"
implementation of Java, or dropping Java
altogether.

While Button would not comment on such
speculation, he did say that "at this point it
is so premature for anyone to think that
was merited. As long as we have the ability
to innovate and add value, we've heard
nothing new to change our business or
product strategies" in regard to Java.

"We have no plans to ship an alternate
framework," he continued, adding that "at
this point, we're not ready to many any
announcements not required in the order."

Specifically, Button said the vendor would
alter Visual J++ to enable several of its
extension to the language--including
Windows platform-specific keywords and
compiler directives--as an option rather
than a default within the tool.

Developers would have to "flick a switch" to
enable these non-Java-compatible
elements, and, as per the court order, first
see a dialog box warning them that they
were entering a mode that would create
Windows-specific Java code, Button said.

He said Microsoft had no problem alerting
users to that fact. Indeed, it was the
message they had been stressing all along
regarding Java. "We believe developers
using Visual J++ use it primarily to build
Windows software," he said.

Button said Microsoft would also, per the
court order, include Sun's Java Native
Interface (JNI) in its runtime environments,
as well as offer support for building code
based on JNI in its Java tools.

Up to now, Microsoft has only included is
own native interfaces to the Windows
platform, including Raw Native Interface
(RNI) and J/Direct.

That caused cross-platform problems for
Java developers, because Microsoft's
Virtual Machine is the only one to support
those interfaces to Windows-native code.
Every other VM relies on JNI.




To: Dale J. who wrote (11827)11/19/1998 5:09:00 PM
From: treetopflier  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 64865
 
<If you really had confidence in SUNW you wouldn't be annoyed at my opinion that it is overbought.>

Hmmm, let's see. 500+ Starfires sold to date at an average selling price of >$5M... And it is at the very early edge of the adoption curve. I don't know of ANY Sun shops on the planet that wouldn't LOVE to get one of these boxes in their shop to consolidate some of their servers.

64 bit competition disappearing.

Huge DASD sales as companies continue to gobble up storage.

Services revenue at all time highs.

Great low end offerings.

Java helping Sun gain mindshare everywhere.

An operating system that runs on everything but Waring blenders and you wonder why we are annoyed with you???

An AMAT short I can understand, as well as CPQ while they figure out their channel strategy and how to integrate their acquisitions, but SUNW (and ORCL for that matter) may be timed poorly.

Greenspan has one more rate cut in him yet this year and it will be timed to get us off and running into the Q1 boom. I expect him to continue to cut rates all of next year as well. Up until 45 days ago I'd have been shorting these with you. With the Fed playing the market and demonstrating they'll do so through the millennium you are at risk with key players like SUNW.

Lots of HW/SW still to be sold and installed for Y2K as well.

Best of luck Dale.

ttf



To: Dale J. who wrote (11827)11/19/1998 8:15:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
What HE said...

Best of luck Dale.

ttf


I agree Dale. I'm ambivalent about your 'trade' position either way (I'm a long-term long), but you're standing on the tracks. Haven't you seen those public 'railway safety' spots on television?
:)

Sun's aflame.

JCJ



To: Dale J. who wrote (11827)11/23/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Alex Chun  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
Dale, you were simply wrong about this:

> 70? No way. That is funny. I would add to my short position
> if it hit 70. But that won't happen instead I will cover at 58.

Not only *did* Sun hit 70, you *didn't* add to your short position
(apparently) when it did.

This tends to undermine your credibility, IMO.

-Alex
(long SUNW)