Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (12520)	11/20/1998 1:00:00 AM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

<< stock held hostage backs in contempt of court illegal short positions.>> I think a lot of folks do not realize that this is a fundamental basis for this case. Shoprting penny stocks is illegal for a very good reason and this thread offers considerable evidence as to why this practive must not be allowed. Hogger

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (12520)	11/20/1998 1:07:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

a party who seek injunctive relief must show it will suffer "irreparable" harm if relief denied. i believe aznt will do so. Judge George appears to be sceptical: 12 And one of the first questions that probably came to your 13 mind and perhaps everyone else is it would appear to me that 14 this stock was sold to create, I guess, resources for Amazon, 15 the hope that you would have funds that you would operate the 16 company from. 17 And if they were sold and a value was determined, why is it 18 that money damages, in other words legal relief, would not 19 satisfy you, rather than pursuing an equitable remedy? 20 I understand that stocks may have an inherent value. But 21 clearly, it appears to me that Amazon intended to sell that 22 much in terms of their stock.

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (12520)	11/20/1998 1:14:00 AM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

<<andy mann must PROVE why this should not happen. he is already in default. "monetary settlement" ?? a party who seek injunctive relief must show it will suffer "irreparable" harm if relief denied.>> Again, you make a very good point {if in somewhat broken english}. You seem to realize something that the FBN BSB'ers either do not recognize, or want badly to deny. This is a matter called 'specific performance.' It is usually applied to cases where the performance of an action (in this case, return of the stock) would provide the relief sought by the plaintiff and that a monetary amount, such as the amount involved in the breach would not provide. The possible scenario is not far fetched ... it is probably just misapplied as there should be little probability of that occuring. Hogger