SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (37216)11/21/1998 8:53:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Coby, You can't do it because Wall Street analysis, bullish or bearish, is now one-source. The analyst calls the co. and the co. provides projections of sales and profit margins and as much breakdown as the analyst wants. For example, one of the problems, out of many, I've had with Kurlak over the years is his absolute ignorance of Asian chip capacity. If Micron or AMD or Intel isn't telling him they are worried about it, he doesn't report on it and I suspect, isn't even aware of it. After they get wacked by the glut of capacity, then he takes notice. And Kurlak is not the worst analyst out there. Pretty much everyone on Wall Street, in 1996, ignored the fact that the Taiwanese were building DRAM fabs all over the island. I couldn't believe it. How else could Whittington, who was numero uno before Kurlak, derive a $17 eps estimate for MU in 1997? They were not within $18 of that number. <G> So, my main concern is that the analysts are working with either faulty, incomplete or horribly biased data, or all of the above.

As to valuation, I think the analysts show their true colors when they change price targets. If they have a decent valuation model, the only thing that can change price targets is a change in the risk free rate or in the profit outlook of the co. But, during this latest goosestep up, analysts have been raising price targets without raising eps or without reference to them being due to an interest rate change. They raise price targets because their previous price targets were violated. That is not valuation. That is momentum speculation and has nothing to do with investment. If a stock has moved above fair value, your target should be the same, which means you should expect it to move down. But that is not politic. The first thing that causes an upgrade is not a change in the fundamental outlook, but a change in the stock price. And that is nonsensical for a professional analyst.

BTW, when you have time, read my old piece on The Internet Financial Connection titled "Beyond The Valley of The Dulls-Analysts." You can click on IFC on the SI Home Page. Then, click "full archives" to scan for the title.

I think a betting person should always assume that a brokerage analyst is pretty worthless until proven otherwise. Just think. There is a reason why most mutual fund cos. have their own analysts. True, most of them may be worse, but the idea is that there is little of investment value coming out of Wall Street.

MB