SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (68952)11/22/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE: Price cutting

Intel must continue to drive chip price down as rapidly as it can with its existing capacity. It must induce customers to buy higher and higher speed chips, run at capacity, and shift the mix to higher speed and value chips. In the short-run, this decreases its cash profits below what they might be with higher prices, but it increases future value. The low prices certainly impact its mini-competitors in the short-run, but allow the rapid expansion of demand for PC's and render "appliances" more and more unsaleable.
To increase demand for high-speed chips, Intel needs three things: (1) much improved OS's (interface and reliability); (2) higher net bandwidth; and (3) applications that demand powerful microprocessors (such as DTV, 3D, speech, hifi audio, etc.). It is working to accomplish 2 and 3, but Microsoft shows little interest in 1, and is attempting to gain position in the appliance market.
Vigorous price cutting will accelerate high-end PC growth. Failure to cut and to push into new markets and market sectors could be an irreversible error for the industry. It is the best thing Intel can do for the industry and component mfrs. By increasing quantity demanded, it even benefits sales of its mpu competitors.




To: Scumbria who wrote (68952)11/22/1998 4:29:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Scumbria - Re: " Intel's excessive price cutting has not been beneficial to anybody, particularly not shareholders of companies in the semiconductor industry."

When did Intel declare a Holy War to underprice their CPUs 25% below AMD's ?

You have it all backwards.

Intel did cut prices - but only in reaction to AMD.

ANd as Intel's costs keep coming down, look for continued price cuts by Intel. AMD will have to earn their money.

Paul