Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Check who wrote (1332)	11/24/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3282

<<Now where exactly are 89 and 90 ???>> Hole 90 is 50 meters south-east of 80 and 75 meters north-east of 84 or so. IOW, we cannot say that it will help the tonnage by much but will certainly improve the grade around 80-84. Hole 89 was drilled in a NW direction from the same station as hole 88 which is 100 meters west of hole 84. Holes 88 and 89 do more much more to increase tonnage than 90.

To: Check who wrote (1332)	11/24/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3282

Ya, the info published was a bit incomplete. I agree with you on 86. 87 which in my view was an important hole is a dud. Although a good intercept, 88 is not economic in my view. Hole 89 is at 576 ew and 402 ns, which puts it roughly between 84 and 88 but the azimuth is 300 so it cuts back across the zone and is not a true width. Hole 90 is at 714 ew and 445 ns so it is about 43 meters due east of Hole 80 and is on the same section. Doesn't add much except a lot of splash. It looks more and more like a fault controlled structure that trends roughly 300 degrees. To test this they should set up between 76 and 80 and drill at 210 but why spoil the fun?