Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Pacel (PLRP): If NASA likes them, shouldn't we? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColleenB who wrote (1896)	11/24/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: Provocateur	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3171

Yes, he also said he hadn't heard of the litigation LOL. He is probably maintaining a Sgt.Schultz a la Hogan's Heroes Policy ("I know nothing"). It's to be expected. If it is his word vs. Calkins, I will take Calkins. He has more to lose in this than any of us. As for the increase in the float and O/S, it was expected and could have been much worse. Like I said before, despite a nice strong open to the stock...I think we are still early. Many of those who bought in at the .20, .30, .40 and higher level have sold off at a loss. Add to that the bit players who have become liquid due to having received payment in shares (financing, lawyers, PR people, etc.). Hence, you have our current predicament. It is important for Calkins to stay focused on the business side and forget about the stock side for the time being. If he can make 1999 a milestone year for Pacel, get the word out about its products, and start wrapping up some serious contracts....the price will take care of itself IMO. Prov