To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (6289 ) 11/27/1998 11:06:00 PM From: Jack Park Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18928
Hi Tom. Glad you like that. I'm without opinion on hats, Tshirts and the like, though I was stunned by the quality and attractiveness of the hat. I do, however, have some opinions about other aspects of AIM and your work I shall offer (tongue ensconsed deeply in cheek). First, I think you are doing one helluva job supporting the desire of others to get on board AIM as it was originally conceived by Lichello. You have never even complained about the slapdash fiddling I have done to see if evolutionary programming might bring about enhanced performance at the cost of the simplicity AIM presently has. I have subscribed to S&C for years and suspect that they could eventually be interested in a paper on AIM, so long as it is contrasted, compared, and placed in the context of technical analysis, which I think the IW does a bit of. I have been noodling such a paper. However, it does seem that there needs to be a good general site where folks can go and, yes, buy Tshirts, caps, and so forth, plus find links to all the other folks who are supporting AIM as well, of which there are several to be proud of. I would certainly think that a jump to your site in S&C would be appropriate, which means, of course, that I am suggesting you get those tshirts and caps up there for sale post haste (if they are not already :-) I actually think that the AIM approach can be taken by the vast masses as they discover the many failures with conventional TA that they may (or may not) experience. I sure have. Further (perhaps finally) I have been observing some friends messing with FT over the last couple of years. That's a great idea, and I still believe that fund switching has a future as I have discussed on my forum in the past. But, for many of the FTers who have finally gone off and hired some guru to swith their funds (and lost there too), I suspect AIM should be their next step. Cheers, Jack