SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Voice-on-the-net (VON), VoIP, Internet (IP) Telephony -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1994)12/1/1998 8:00:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
Teltran to Launch Voice Over Internet Service

December 1, 1998

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE) Teltran
International Inc. (OTC BB:TLTG) Monday
announced that it will begin sellings its
Teltran VoIP Service to US corporations and
telecommunications carriers.

Leveraging their position as an affiliate
within the worldwide Internet Telephony
network of OzEmail Interline, Teltran VoIP
Service (TVS) will offer customers a Voice
over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone service
initially to 10 countries with more being
added during the First Quarter of 1999.

TVS calls will be simple to make, originate
and terminate over local phone networks,
require no costly telephony equipment, and
not require the receiver of calls to be a TVS
customer. Teltran will use a private Internet
to route calls from their gateways to the
gateways of other affiliates throughout the
world thus eliminating the costly overseas
segment of the voice or data call. TVS will
offer service to all countries worldwide
using their international long distance
carrier network for calls to countries not
being routed over the Internet.

Teltran and Interline have signed multi-year
agreements whereby Teltran is an affiliate
in Interline's worldwide consortium of
carriers and will also refile traffic that does
not get routed over their Internet telephony
network. Other Interline affiliates include
Mitsubishi in Japan, Hyundai in South Korea,
Concentric in the US, Magic Tel in Hong
Kong and New Zealand's Voyager.

"Teltran VoIP Service will continue the
Internet based telephony strategy Teltran
is pursuing," stated Byron Lerner, president
& CEO of Teltran. "We feel TVS, coupled
with our other telephony services, will lead
to a very profitable 1999."

Licensed by the FCC as a global
facilities-based common carrier, Teltran
offers a full range of telecommunications
services including Voice over IP, domestic
and international long distance, fax
broadcast services, calling card programs
and satellite communications.

Certain statements made herein that are
not historical are forward-looking within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements may
differ materially from actual future events or
results. The future performance of the
company involves risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ
markedly from those anticipated by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks
include but are not limited to the following:
a limited operating history for the company;
potential fluctuations in operating results;
competition; pricing pressure; dependence
on third-party suppliers of hardware and
software; shortage of modems; dependence
on telecommunications carriers;
management of growth; limited market; a
need for and risks of international
expansion; the existence of a new and
uncertain market; customer retention
issues; rapid technological change; security
risks; the risk of system failure; formal
licensing and joint marketing agreements;
patents and proprietary rights; infringement
claims; changes in government regulation;
risks associated with providing content
including potential liability; dependence on
key personnel and need to hire additional
qualified personnel; uncertainty of currency
exchange rates; need for additional capital;
and enforceability of civil liabilities.

CONTACT: Teltran International, New York |
Jimmy Tubbs, 1-888-TELTRAN |
www.teltran.com

[Copyright 1998, Business Wire]



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1994)12/1/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
OzEmail Joins Canberra Broadband Network

December 1, 1998

SYDNEY, Nov. 30 /PRNewswire/ OzEmail Limited
(Nasdaq: OZEMY), the leading provider of
comprehensive Internet services in
Australasia, today announced it is providing
high speed Internet access services as a
partner in the TransAct Broadband
Communications Pilot in Canberra,
Australia's national capital.

"This pilot will demonstrate the future of
high bandwidth services to the home," said
OzEmail Chief Executive Officer Sean
Howard. "For OzEmail, working with the
Australian Capital Territory Electricity and
Water Corporation (ACTEW) to provide
Internet access reflects our commitment to
bringing the Internet into all homes at a
speed and performance which will ensure it
becomes part of daily life," said Mr. Howard.

The ACTEW is provisioning a full service
network in Aranda, a suburb of Canberra, as
the first stage in establishing a citywide
network providing high speed, high
performance connectivity to all homes in
our nation's capital. The pilot is designed to
test the technical performance of the
fibre-optic network before it is rolled out
across Canberra. Participants in the pilot
will be using the fastest domestic network
available in Australia today with speeds of
10-20Mbps available in each home. The
services available will include telephony,
video on demand, video conferencing, and
online content and data services.

"We are excited to be involved in the
provision of a true broadband network," said
Mr. Howard. "Our future as a company and
as a nation in the global information
economy depends on the infrastructure we
put in place. Networks such as this are
laying the foundations for this future."

OzEmail is working with AdvaTel in
establishing efficient and economic
deployment strategies for our network
expansion to support the ACTEW pilot.
OzEmail is deploying AdvaTel supplied xDSL
technology, used for high-speed services
over telephone lines, in the absence of
fibre.

"xDSL technologies are necessary tools in
delivering low cost bandwidth. We welcome
OzEmail's invitation to participate in this
network expansion project," said Michael
Terry, Managing Director of AdvaTel.

"The investment we are making in staff,
infrastructure and applications research and
development are positioning OzEmail to take
advantage of the anticipated expansion of
broadband cable and wireless networks
across Australia next century," said Mr.
Howard.

About AdvaTel

AdvaTel is a fully Australian owned and
operated telecommunications supplier
specialising in xDSL technologies, call centre
products, call routing, call accounting and
voice/data multiplexing. AdvaTel is the
Australasian representative for PairGain
Technologies, Inc of California, the world's
largest xDSL supplier with over 1 million
units installed.

About OzEmail

OzEmail is the leading provider of
comprehensive Internet services in
Australia. The Company's Internet services
are designed to meet the different needs of
its residential and enterprise customers
ranging from low cost dial up to high
performance, continuous access services
integrating the Company's ISDN offering and
consulting expertise. OzEmail's Internet
telephony business -- Interline -- is a
partnership between OzEmail Ltd (88%) and
Ideata Pty Ltd (12%), an Australian
manufacturer of telecommunications
equipment. Interline has developed and is
operating technology that allows the
placement, routing and billing of high quality
voice services over the Internet, using
existing tone dial phones.

Certain statements made herein that are
not historical are forward-looking within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements may
differ materially from actual future events or
results. The future performance of the
Company involves risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ
markedly from those anticipated by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks
include but are not limited to the following:
a limited operating history for the Company;
potential fluctuations in operating results;
competition; pricing pressure; dependence
on third-party suppliers of hardware and
software; shortage of modems; dependence
on telecommunications carriers;
management of growth; limited market; a
need for and risks of international
expansion; the existence of a new and
uncertain market; customer retention
issues; rapid technological change; security
risks; the risk of system failure; formal
licensing and joint marketing agreements;
patents and proprietary rights; infringement
claims; changes in government regulation;
risks associated with providing content
including potential liability; dependence on
key personnel and need to hire additional
qualified personnel; uncertainty of currency
exchange rates; need for additional capital;
enforceability of civil liabilities; antitakeover
impact of Australian foreign investment
restrictions; control of the Company by the
Board of Directors; and possible volatility of
ADS price. For a more complete description
of certain of such risks and uncertainties,
we refer you to the documents that the
Company has filed from time to time with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("
SEC") including its registration statements
on Form F-1 dated August 26, 1998, August
25, 1998 and May 28, 1996, its 1997 Form
10-K dated May 15,1998, 1996 Form 10-K
dated March 31, 1997, its quarterly reports
on Form 6-K dated August 14, 1998, and
May 15, 1998, its Amendment No. 1 to Form
10-Q for the period to September 30, 1997,
dated May 21, 1998, its Amendment No. 1
to Form 10-Q for the period to June 30,
1997, dated May 21, 1998,and its Form
10-Qs dated August 13, 1996, November
14, 1996, and May 8, 1997.

SOURCE OzEmail Limited

/CONTACT: Michael Ward of OzEmail, in
Sydney, 61-2-9433-2498; or Jane Taylor of
ACTEW, in Canberra, 61-2-6248-3262; or
Philip Louey of AdvaTel, 61-3-9690-5888, or
loueyp@advatel.com.au/ /Web site:
ozemail.com (OZEMY)

[Copyright 1998, PR Newswire]





To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1994)12/1/1998 8:17:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
MCI WorldCom Accused of Overcharges

December 1, 1998

WASHINGTON - The Associated Press: Two groups
accused MCI WorldCom Monday of not complying with
federal regulators' order to stop charging
certain customers its highest rates.

Earlier this month, the Federal
Communications Commission directed the
company to cease charging those customers
''nonsubscriber'' or ''casual calling'' rates.
To comply with the FCC's action, MCI filed a
revised tariff to the commission.

But a law firm, Halprin, Temple, Goodman &
Sugrue, and Freedom Technologies Inc., a
telecommunications consulting company
owned by Albert Halprin, a partner in the law
firm, and his wife, contend in a filing to the
FCC that the revised tariff does not comply
with the FCC's order. The two groups
initiated the casual calling case against MCI.

MCI spokesman Brad Burns responded:
''We're confident that the changes we did
make in our tariff address the FCC's concerns
... and fully comply with the FCC's order.''

Halprin said the revised tariff doesn't cover
all MCI customers who are dropped from the
company's ''billing system'' and, as a result,
are its highest rates.

For instance, people who are dropped from
the billing system after moving are not
covered by the revised tariff. They would
continue to be billed, but at the highest rate
instead of the one to which they subscribed.

MCI's casual customers pay a $2.49
surcharge and 38 cents a minute for each
call.

People who are dropped from the billing
system after accruing several unpaid bills,
however, would no longer be bumped to the
highest rate, under MCI's revised tariff.
Instead, their service would be terminated.

The FCC's order applied only to customers
who had selected MCI as their primary
long-distance carrier and then were billed at
the company's highest rate. It does not
apply to people who have not chosen MCI as
their primary long-distance carrier but use it
occasionally by dialing an access code.

[Copyright 1998, Associated Press]



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1994)12/1/1998 8:28:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
Someone have a spare room? Co-locationBypassing ISPS -- Co-location could solve bandwidth, security woes

December 1, 1998

COMPUTER RESELLER NEWS: Waltham, Mass.

For VARs whose customers want heavy-duty,
guaranteed performance of their Web
application and vaulted security, an emerging
service called co-location could be the
answer.

Co-location is not for customers that need
help integrating their applications, nor is it
for small users who want to host a simple
Web site on a shared server. Rather,
co-location places a customer's Web servers
at a network access point (NAP), or peering
point, where data can quickly hop on the
Internet backbone without navigating
through regional ISP networks.

The servers also can be placed in a
fortress-like atmosphere that can help ease
the worries of even the most paranoid
customer.

VARs said co-location services are gaining
popularity because few enterprise customers
want the hassle of baby-sitting their own
servers, building a secure facility and
maintaining multiple connections to the
Internet backbone.

"Our customers like it because they don't
have to hire the extra staff, " said Gordon
Schultz, president of ComSource Global
Network, a Concord, Mass.-based reseller.
"With data growing at about 70 percent a
year, most places know they need a Web
presence, but they don't have the expertise
[to manage it themselves]."

Analysts predict spectacular growth for
co-location services, particularly as
enterprise resource planning (ERP) and
electronic-commerce applications come
online and customers become more
concerned about adequate bandwidth. This
trend coincides with the efforts of carriers to
differentiate their services and boost their
customers' network performance.

"Of course, one way to deal with [concerns
about lack of bandwidth] is to co-locate at a
major peering point so you are right on the
backbone," said Neville O'Reilly, a
telecommunications analyst at Telechoice
Inc., a Tulsa, Okla., consulting firm.

As a general category, Web hosting is
enjoying rapid growth. Revenue from Web
hosting is expected to quadruple to about $1
billion between 1997 and 1998 and to top
$10 billion in 2002, according to Forrester
Research, a Cambridge, Mass.-based
research firm.

Forrester does not break out revenue
projections for co-location separately from
those of other forms of hosting.

But Forrester analyst David Cooperstein said
co-location is considered to be closer to
complex hosting because the servers house
major applications, even though co-location
does not involve the management of those
applications.

The profile of a typical co-location customer
is either a company that does business only
on the Internet, such as Lycos Inc., Hotmail
or Geocities, or a large corporation.

"These customers would have to make the
decision to either build their own data
centers or outsource, and it makes more
sense to outsource," said Ellen Hancock,
chief executive at Exodus Communications
Inc., Santa Clara, Calif. Exodus has made a
specialty of hosting data centers and in 1999
plans to focus on marketing efforts to
attract companies interested in outsourcing,
she said.

Reddy Marri, president of Reccom, an Irvine,
Calif.-based reseller, cited a customer whose
business was training teachers on the
Internet and needed a T3 line quickly from
the local regional Bell operating company.

The RBOC did not have fiber to the
customer's location, so rather than wait six
months for the 45-Megabit-per-second
service, the customer shipped the server to
a PSINet Inc. co-location site, Marri said.

Many ISPs, such as PSINet, Herndon, Va., or
GTE Internetworking, Cambridge, Mass., and
companies that specialize in secure-building
server "safe houses," such as Frontier Corp.'s
Global Center division, Sunnyvale, Calif., and
Exodus, sell co-location services through
channel programs. Exodus is not an ISP, but
it has numerous peering arrangements with
other ISPs.

Security is a major consideration for many
co-location customers. Exodus data centers
are Fort Knox-like facilities with multiple
Internet connections, pin codes and
scanners, security checks to the building and
around-the-clock support. Hancock said
Exodus also has plans for disaster-recovery
options.

At PSINet, where 40 percent to 50 percent
of its co-location sales are attributed to its
VARs, there are now seven facilities that
house customers' servers. PSINet expects to
build six more centers by the end of 1999.

And Level 3 Communications Inc., Omaha,
Neb., expects to have 26 centers by
mid-1999, up from 10 centers currently, said
Stephanie Copeland, Level 3's director of
data services.

Level 3, which just started selling service on
its new international IP network in
September, has opened co-location facilities
across the United States. Among them is a
Texas-size center in Dallas measuring 89,000
square feet-40,000 feet of which is pure
co-location space. Level 3's facilities are now
20,000 square feet.

---

Fast Facts:

-Large, mission-critical sites are most often
co-located.

-Co-locators offer 24 x 7 monitoring, secure
premises.

-VARs can resell service from several
vendors.

<<COMPUTER RESELLER NEWS -- 11-30-98,