Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (16171)	11/28/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

A mid-level executive was so frustrated at being passed over for promotion year after year, that, in frustration, he went to a brain-transplant center in the hope of raising his I.Q. 20 points. After a battery of physical and psychological tests, he was told by the center's director that he was an acceptable candidate. "That's great!" the executive said. "But I understand that this procedure can be really expensive." "Yes, sir, it can," the director replied. "An ounce of accountant's brain for example, costs one thousand dollars; an ounce of an economist's brain costs two thousand; an ounce of a corporate president's is forty-five thousand. An ounce of a Democrat's brain is seventy-five thousand dollars." "Seventy-five thousand dollars for an ounce of a Democrat's brain?? Why on earth is that?" "Do you have any idea," the director asked, "how many Democrats we would have to kill?" ***************************************************

To: John Lacelle who wrote (16171)	11/28/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

One can not reasonably ask or expect Clinton not to lie. That would be akin to asking a fish not to swim or a bird not to fly. Its just a natural state for the pervert. JLA

To: John Lacelle who wrote (16171)	11/28/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

John: Of interest to me as a lawyer is the National Embarrassment's answer to question # 4 from the Judiciary Committee. He neglects to answer the part of the question which requires him to state whether he is subject to the rules of the bar and the code of professional responsibility. Presumably he feels he not. I'm sure the Arkansas Bar Association will be interested to learn this. Of course any of us mere mortals would already have been disbarred by now. In fact I wonder why the Judge being aware of this conduct has not made the referral herself. Incredible! JLA