Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (5671)	11/29/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

FMK your projections may be optimistic. But given the potential one might say realistic. Wolanchuck says a $100 stock, who's to say he is wrong. We'll have corrections along the way but I'm taking the high road and believe $100 in a year is not unrealistic. Buckle up!

To: FMK who wrote (5671)	11/29/1998 8:07:00 PM
From: Dennis V.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

FMK >There is already a consensus<...a majority maybe, consensus, no. Getting a consensus around here would be difficult IMO. The army contract piques my interest. Despite the jokes and cliches thrown at the govt. procurement people, if, in fact, the US Govt. has purchased the Alliant battery, their product must be state of the art. Indeed, I had heard, some years ago, while still with a govt. agency, that the rifle, which was only on the drawing boards, would use electronic sights and electrically primed ammunition. This is serious stuff, and anybody who wins the contract for the power source is probably on the leading edge. Its possible that the low bid got it, but with an item as hot as the military's new rifle, chances are the lead engineer would try to convince the procurement officer to buy the best product even if they had to go "sole source".