SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TEDennis who wrote (9053)11/30/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10786
 
Saying that the transaction would be "lost" was probably thrown in for the scare value.

It was Woodward and another guy with him that "corrected" the Cap Gemini employee to say, emphatically, the transaction would be "deleted". Yes, I also found that quite odd. Perhaps all legal transactions are applied (copied) to various accounts and then all the (original) transactions are deleted (?) Still, I always tell people that half of any good program is error checking and deleting anything automatically because it doesn't conform as seemed to be the case here is simply bad programming.

- Jeff



To: TEDennis who wrote (9053)11/30/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Larry Brew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10786
 
TED, << the 60 minute programmer >>

He had 60 minutes of training. Like me, he's an actor. He pretends
he knows programming and I pretend to know stocks. <gg>
Larry



To: TEDennis who wrote (9053)11/30/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: JDN  Respond to of 10786
 
Dear TEDennis: Well it scared me. I ordered a new mattress (ggg) JDN PS: Received the Sedona C of C color handbook.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News