Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Smith who wrote (5784)	12/6/1998 12:05:00 AM
From: FMK	Respond to of 27311

Yes Greg, I acknowledge there is some risk. I am already on record as having estimated the chances of failure at around 0.1%. If the financing package is a problem for you, you might consider watching from the sidelines. BTW, You missed a post clarifying that Lev meant batteries, not cells, per minute. My notes indicate that line 1's design capacity is 10 batteries per minute. I would estimate they are now somewhere around 7.5 per minute. Please refer to this post: exchange2000.com

To: Greg Smith who wrote (5784)	12/6/1998 1:41:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

You should listen to FMK!!

To: Greg Smith who wrote (5784)	12/6/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Jeff S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Greg Smith: You should listen to yourself, and be very cautious. Although I am long, I am very concerned about the possibility of short selling by CC and the increase in common shares from the conversion! What we desparetly need, as shareholders, is: 1. An announcement of a new CFO, and 2. An annoucement of a contract. In my opinion, (it ain't humble), if VLNC can get a contract with some smaller players, and rev up the production lines, lets do it. How long are they going to wait? If they can not get a contract with the biggest boys, screw it! Get a contract already! Fish or cut bait, let's get some contracts, rev up production and generate some revenue. I guess I must seem a little impatient. YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT! Jeff

To: Greg Smith who wrote (5784)	12/6/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Greg: I've followed this company company for a long time and I have to side with FMK about the possibilities of failure here are close to nil. Many worry warts seem to excessively obsess about worst case scenarios. Many indulge in their worries and wallow in their indecision. Choosing to fret and stew over their investment rather than investigate and analyze. The company has said all the right things scheduled all the right visits put the lines together at the right times, tested and re-tested qualified and re-qualified. And now we are on the edge of our seats waiting for lift-off. Many seem to be concerned about the short interest rising. For me this is one of the most bullish indicators I have taken notice of. We've seen a rise from the 3's to the 10's in the last few months, of course the short interest is going to rise. But, I don't think the shorters realize that Valence does have a product and when more positive developments are unveiled our beloved shorters will cover their positions and launch us to that three figured stock price Wolanchuck is anticipating. So cheer up worry warts and cover your asses shortys cause Valence is revving up the engines and the race is on!!!