Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBL who wrote (17683)	12/7/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Every man a king, JBL. The Kingfish solution has been proposed here, in www2.techstocks.com. But I think you are stretching things a bit. As far as trying to shout people down, it cuts both ways. Did you notice the nice way JLA welcomed a newcomer yesterday? www2.techstocks.com , www2.techstocks.com ? Do you think JLA was trying to encourage an open debate among all comers there? As to Salon, I haven't checked that site in a long time. There is something I meant to check on there, perhaps I'll get back to you on that. Edit: it was easy to find. For amusement only, I think. salonmagazine.com Meanwhile, perhaps you'd like to confer with Bill Vaughn on the role of personal values with respect to party affiliation: Political party affiliation has little or nothing to do with values. (http://www2.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-6720299) I'm confused, as you'd informed me of the obvious previously: Isn't it obvious to you that the decision to belong to a political party, or a religious group, should be based on your personal values, and not on how favorable it will be to your career? www2.techstocks.com I'd invited Bill to discuss this with you, but sadly he declined my invitation.