Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16796)	12/8/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

First, they have to get a horse. That chichiuia painted-up to look like a horse, although it IS cute, will not do.

To: PartyTime who wrote (16796)	12/8/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Please cite a post within the last two months where anyone is saying buy. PT, I'm quite sure no one has directly said buy in the last couple of months, as you have been challenged on that a few times. Going back further though, we can see that was where the hype started (and you were wondering where I was getting those ancient quotes of yours from?) All the attempts to cover absolutely anything negative with overloads of optimism based on promises and false hopes lead some people to believe that is the intent is to show new investors only a positive face with the hopes that they buy in. If that is not the case, why make try to explain away errors made by management? Why try to explain a NASDAQ decision as a "technicality"? Why try to counter every negative comment or question? In the long term none of these should matter if this stock is really to stand on its own. If it can't stand in the face of criticism, it won't last. The fact I, personally, attempt to obtain a strict standard of proof from Negheads should not be misinterpreted, must it BlueFox? What you fail to realize, PT, is that most people do not see you holding yourself to the same standard. Those posting negative comments must produce court documents to satisfy you, yet you're free to make all sorts of wild claims and predictions to point all doubt away from the company or its management (or advisors, etc). We've heard about ex-SIMers doing all sorts of things, we've heard about Market Makers, we've heard about shorters, we've heard about people trying to downplay the stock to buy in cheap, and so on. All these great theories with no requirement to meet your own "standard of proof". BF