Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (38606)	12/8/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

so, do we buy the dip for the L-T yet? (G)

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (38606)	12/8/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: accountclosed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

i bought cyqpp today before your post. I thought you were going to wait on csco ;-)

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (38606)	12/8/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: bob s	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

MB-I was surprised that puts for the IIX index don't have decent volume unless the expiration is like January. With your recent put positions (going out several months)I was going to semi-mirror your move without any specific stocks but apparently the trading is very thin and that bothers me. There is an index (as you no doubt know)called the Morgan Stanley (MSH) that appears to be more hi tech focused than the Nas 100 that has more volume and might be a better choice. Your thoughts please. Thanks again for a great thread!! Bob

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (38606)	12/17/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: waverider	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Michael, new to your thread. I've done my homework and agree with most of your put positions. Any changes on NVLS, INTC, and MU? And this may be a stupid question, but who are you? What is your background that leads to such a following here? Great thread. Thanks, <H>