SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Health care / Social Security / Medicare & politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mrknowitall who wrote (10)12/8/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25
 
Mr. K,

Your proposal is rubbish. It makes sense. How in the world would you ever expect any of our elected officials to actually pass legislation that makes sense?

KJC (tongue-in-cheek, of course)



To: mrknowitall who wrote (10)12/9/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: steve kammerer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25
 
MrK, interesting ideas for SS. Problems I see for any part of SS funds in stock market is the effect when large numbers of baby boomers are retiring and selling equities. Part of what's propping this market up to unrealistically high PE's is the huge inflow of 401k funds now.
Other problem is that individual mutual funds will be bribing (American term = campaign contributions, politicians to have their funds included which will mean higher annual fees.
If a minimum payment is guaranteed by US government then the money will be invested in more dangerous, risky and/or leveraged investments.
Don't know where we are going to end up
stevek



To: mrknowitall who wrote (10)12/10/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25
 
I think our SS funds should all be invested in cattle futures
with Hillary Clinton in charge of making all trading decisions.