SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Health care / Social Security / Medicare & politics
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
25 2 0
Emcee:  mrknowitall Type:  Unmoderated
When the storms in Washington abate, someone is going to turn their attention to the impending SS debacle. The financial impact for all of us is, and will be significant, particularly in years to come. Your thoughts, opinions and ideas on what should be and can be done with one of the largest segments of our economy.
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
25 I think the best plan is to means test both Medicare and Social security. EvenGeorge Dawson-5/3/2000
24 Our Senators and Congressmen don't pay in to Social Security, and, of coursRagTimeBand-5/1/2000
23 I say we get rid of SS altogether. Continue payments to those already recievindelong-3/16/1999
22 With a note of thanks to Les Horowitz: Medicare Could Be Fixed, But Politics Imrknowitall-12/14/1998
21 A few (serious) thoughts this time... While individual accounts would be nice,Peter O'Brien-12/11/1998
20 Steve - good points - if we break the problem down to its fundamentals, our premrknowitall-12/11/1998
19 Les - interesting - although the 2013 date is only slightly disingenuous - it amrknowitall-12/11/1998
18 Article about law enacted to actually print the IOU's that stuffed in the SLes H-12/11/1998
17 Hmmmm - but then again, who was it that put the deal together for her? I suspemrknowitall-12/10/1998
16 I think our SS funds should all be invested in cattle futures with Hillary ClinPeter O'Brien-12/10/1998
15 MrK, interesting ideas for SS. Problems I see for any part of SS funds in stocsteve kammerer-12/9/1998
14 A Job in France? No Sweat Laws Banning Overwork Trim Executives' Hours Les H-12/9/1998
13 We need them to expand the Separation of Powers to make all legislation that afLes H-12/9/1998
12 The trust fund is invested in non-marketable debt securities that pay less thanLes H-12/9/1998
11 Mr. K, Your proposal is rubbish. It makes sense. How in the world would you evEL KABONG!!!-12/8/1998
10 Kerry - You're right about some individual investors - there need to be conmrknowitall-12/8/1998
9 Mr K, Ah, the lesser of two evils. I'd pick the bureaucrats over the indivEL KABONG!!!-12/8/1998
8 Mr. K., I agree! The fallacy that only rich people should be invested in stockWho, me?-12/8/1998
7 Kerry - if we leave that money in the hands of the SS Administration (which &qumrknowitall-12/8/1998
6 You are so correct, I'm depressed now!<g> If the Republicans try tWho, me?-12/8/1998
5 In its simplest terms, SS is a Ponzi scheme that has a fundamental cash-flow prmrknowitall-12/8/1998
4 Mr K, If this came to a vote of the people (I know. It won't.) I'd be EL KABONG!!!-12/8/1998
3 Okay, what's the next alternative? It's going broke the way it is...anWho, me?-12/8/1998
2 The primary danger I see in privatizing SS is in who makes the decisions about mrknowitall-12/8/1998
1 Hi, Mr. K! What's your thoughts of allowing SS to be invested in the stockWho, me?-12/8/1998
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):