Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VBroady who wrote (20256)	12/9/1998 8:26:00 AM
From: StandFast	Respond to of 43774

Have to agree with you! The sub .01 price is out of the question. We have a viable company still in its infancy, Slowly building a financial dynasty and putting commercials on TV. With the way things are going, AOL may want a piece of us! <JMO>

To: VBroady who wrote (20256)	12/9/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

I have stayed off of here for a while because I don't see the gain in arguing with Rosie. He makes accusations in compounds such as when he said that it looks like we are printing shares again. That presupposes 1) that shares are being fabricated, and 2) that it has happened before. Neither are true, but once said, it places the onous on others to prove it is a lie. In this matter, it is easy, but other violations of reality are more veiled and do raise doubt in the minds of other investors. This is clearly manipulating the market with false information and is just another example of how Rosie perpetrated fraud on the market. You will not get Rosie to admit that he defrauded us. That is not in his plan. His plan is simply to raise doubt by refusing to respond to any attack on his data. He alludes that he has some back-up which of course he does not. It is like a small child crying Na-na-na-na-na na musically. And the sticking his fingers in his ears and making nonsense noise. He is a child and should be spanked. His actions are criminal and should be prosecuted. Bottom line, boycott any response to him and we will all be better off. Maybe the webmistress will take som affirmitive action, but so far seems to have buckled to the mere threat of legal action. A sad commentary on reality.