Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (17940)	12/9/1998 6:03:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<< If innocent, no president including Clinton should or would set the precedent of paying off a liar. >> The Supreme Court decision to allow civil suits against a sitting President was just plain stupid. I don't understand their political naivety. What's better, to bog down a President for years on civil suits, or to pay of the suits, bogus or not? It is too easy for a President's enemies to mount civil suits against him. If this ruling isn't thrown out, every President will be targetted with civil suits, ones with or without merit. The Supreme Court was not very supreme on this one! << ... you think he DID get a bj from Jones, don't you? >> Not really. But, BJs do seem to be Clinton's favorite method of foreplay.