SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (17947)12/9/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
LoL on the foreplay. But don't worry, there won't be many civil suits against sitting presidents. But when there is a real case, well hell, I don't see why he should be immune, even if i see your point and could otherwise worry about it. Really, It's HE who is clearly guilty or he wouldn't worry about it and wouldn't consider paying anyone off. Bush,Reagan,Carter,ford,Nixon,Johnson and etc., if innocent, wouldn't have considered paying anyone off. That's clear.
I see that brees is up to his malarky about Saddam again...we can agree about that.



To: Machaon who wrote (17947)12/9/1998 9:05:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 67261
 
For crying out loud, "bog him down for years" get real here, eh? The man has no respect for the rights of MANY American women, and would rather defame them than fess up to his deeds- that's clear. IT's disgusting- not his sex drive- but rather his gutless defamation of others who have been touched by it. Any self respecting Democrat would tow the line I'm handing you if this were a Republican President. The sad thing is that the Republicans don't seem to be smart enough to harp on the problem in this light- it IS what you would be saying if Clinton were Republican- and rightly so. And it's the RIGHT way to see it- it's the guts of the matter IMHO. "he's a weasel"- the guy from Salon magizine. Our PeeWee Herman President! hahaha...



To: Machaon who wrote (17947)12/9/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<< The Supreme Court decision to allow civil suits against a sitting President was just plain stupid. I don't understand their political naivety. >>

The Supreme Court is SUPPOSED to be politically naive! I don't understand why you don't understand!

G. W.