Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (17994)	12/9/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<< He never truthfully refuted ANY of her allegations. >> It's up to the accuser to prove her case, not for the accused to prove he is innocent, although it is always good to be able to protect your own arse. Besides that, let's say that you were brought into court for a false sexual abuse case. It's your word against her's. Do you want to have to prove your innocence, or would you prefer her to have to prove her false case? Anyway, Paula's case was thrown out because it didn't meet the burden of proof for sexual harrassment.