Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (17999)	12/9/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

And most lawyers agree that throwing the Jones case out was a serious legal mistake by the judge. The Presidents lawyers knew this- and if it were not so, they'd have at least waited for a ruling to re-instate before paying her $850,000. If the case wasn't expected to be re-instated by virtue of not deserving to be so, there would not be a penny paid to her! NOT A PENNY! If she didn't deserve a case- the president should be strung up for paying her a frivolous penny!

To: Machaon who wrote (17999)	12/10/1998 12:50:00 AM
From: Borzou Daragahi	Respond to of 67261

The Republicans on the committee really wanted to bring Linda, Monica, Wiley, and Paula into the hearing room but were too afraid of the consequences. They would have rather had the White House call them as witnesses, hence all the whining about no factual or evidentiary witnesses. But there was no way the White House was going to call any of those witnesses, because they were afraid of the women being humiliated and the Republicans saying, hey, we didn't them call to the stand, they did. During the Watergate hearings, parades of witnesses, many of them players in the scandal, were called by the majority Democrats to testify. regards