Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TEDennis who wrote (6150)	12/10/1998 12:21:00 PM
From: John Chapman	Respond to of 7491

Ted: What this discussion shows is the importance of the database. We all know the money is in the database. The time. The effort. The labor costs to keep it updated. The most cost effective method is to have vendors send update information to you. In effect, the labor pool becomes thousands. If one could pull this arrangement off is the big question.

To: TEDennis who wrote (6150)	12/10/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

TED, perhaps there is an easier solution... kind of like what the Uninstall programs do: they figure out which files belong to which programs and thus you really don't need to say files A, B, and C are not compliant, but rather MSWorks version X is not compliant, and that you need to upgrade to version Y. What files actually get updated is immaterial. I really doubt the Media Viewer file really has any date logic. It was probably flagged because it wasn't part of the "known to be compliant" file list. Considering the number of discrete files each commercial application now contains, and considering how often software gets updated with the advent of the internet, such a comparison approach would be pointless. - Jeff