SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43140)12/10/1998 1:19:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Respond to of 1580613
 
Re: "It's kind of hard to have KNI-enabled software already out there when Katmai hasn't even been released yet."

Sorry, I just post stuff like that to harass Paul--the way he does with everyone else on the thread (for example with the MSFT timing loop bug), but in reverse. Of course I know better, just like he does, but it's fun anyway. Look how worked up he got:

Message 6774535

Funny thing is compiler tools don't necessarily add up to software support anyway, so you gotta wonder why he attached that article to his post.

<GGG>

And I agree with you about KNI in the absense of DX7. All other things remaining equal, an application using native KNI instructions would show much greater performance without DX7 than anapplication which uses DX7 without native KNI instructions. The problem I think that Intel will have is that it will have all sorts of nice sortware lined up behind KNI at the intro, but it will be niche market stuff (e.g. photo editing, voice recognition, etc.). The games that support Katmai will come later, so KNI's benfits won't be felt in mainstream markets until Q3-Q4 1999 at best. Just my 2 cents.

Kevin



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43140)12/10/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580613
 
Intel is very clever. Even without Katmai instruction support the Katmai will appear faster than the Pentium II. The cache is larger and the Mhz will be higher. This ploy is just like the one they used on the Pentium MMX...where most people didn't know if they would need MMX but upgraded anyway because the chip was faster.
Yet to be seen if Intel can fool the consumer twice but the faster Mhz will help suck in the buyer.

Jim