Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (69728)	12/10/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul Engel In response to your commentary to a prior post you responded < How do Proud New Owners of the 400 MHz K6-2 download the "patch" if they can't boot up their systems?> To that post I responded, in techstocks.com Paul, Re: <How do Proud New Owners of the 400 MHz K6-2 download the "patch" if they can't boot up their systems?> Proud new owners of the 400 MHz K6-2 either are using Win98(which they are if they bought the system whole), Win95 installed by a manufacturer(In which case the patch should have been installed by the manufacturer). In the final case, a hobbiest builds the computer from scratch & sets the cpu to run at 300 MHz to get the patch. Sounds simple enough to me! tgptndr PS Sounds like I took you by surprise last night. I'll work out a response later & post it. To which you Responded in your Message 6766163 <Pretender - re: " I'll be responding to your future AMD posts on the INTC site with a full copy of your AMD site post. " Atta boy, girl ! Short some Intel today? Paul> Which Irked me a little last night, but I more or less got over it. But I did short some INTC today, it looks like a pretty slippery slope to me. I think you are intellectually ugly, a sham & faker, as well as a perpetual liar. Please correct me if I am wrong by posting your trades in real time, as opposed to retrospect. tgptndr (More to follow)

To: Paul Engel who wrote (69728)	12/10/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Why Hello, Paul Re: <Pretender - Re: but I think the tide is running against them, and with the continuing competition, perhaps against all the CPU manufacturers, at least for a while. " Short Intel again, wise guy. You've done it twice and you lost both times. Intel is making money. They are sold out. They have increasing margins. If you can't put 2 and 2 together, SHORT INTEL AGAIN ! The only thing you have proven is that you know how to lose money. Prove it again, Pretender. Paul> I have shorted intel again, as indicated in my last post., this time not against AMD long. I agree with you that I lost about $1000/lot on the first round trip, but have posted several times that the second round trip was in concert with a buy of three shares of AMD per share of INTC sold and that the trip was worth about $.35 per share of INTC sold short. EVEN a DOLT should get the idea eventually. When was the last time you posted your trades in real time? You are a fake, a sham, and a liar, in my opinion(but only based ib conversation with you on line). If INTC is sold out, as you say, I would expect the line item under Inventories reading Finished goods to decrease substantially from the 09-26-98 level of 441,000,000 by the next earnings announcement. We shall see, in mid January. tgptndr