Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJC2006 who wrote (18588)	12/11/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<< Once again, you twist the facts. No where in the letters of impeachment is "lying" mentioned. However perjury is rightly condemned and mentioned throughout. >> Is telling me that I "twist the facts" the same as you not being able to follow along with what I was saying? I think so. Somehow you do not know that a definition of perjury is to lie or mislead. We are talking about politics. The Republicans are setting the precedent that lying "under oath" can be grounds to remove a minority President from office. This is an awful assault on the separation of powers set forth by our constitution! << Yeah, Democrats for so long have gotten by without bothering with that tumor called the Constitution. If you aren't careful it kind of grows on you. >> Ok, how about listing one item about the Democrats violating the Constitution. Why is it that you cannot carry on a conversation without writing insulting comments? Do you lose your temper easily, or do you just find yourself frustrated when presented with the truth? << Yawn....you're pathetic. A very large contingent of Congress people have decided to stand up to the lawlessness of the most politically powerful man in the world and you say they have no backbone or balls. I suggest you lean down and take a look between your legs. >> Another insulting comeback!? Very good. What other childish utterances can you come up with? Think about your above paragraph. You are saying that a majority party needs backbone or balls to stand up to the President, when they are the ones who have the power, and they're the ones that have been trying to take back the WH, by any means, ever since they lost it? You are congratulating the majority party for doing significant damage to our constitution? That doesn't take balls or backbone, it takes a group of politicians who would rather tear our country apart rather than doing positive things for the benefit of the people. Doing positive things takes a lot of work. Playing politics and power plays is the easy thing to do!