Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Strictly Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjs_ynot who wrote (5)	12/13/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Tom Trader	Respond to of 548

I agree with the essence of what you say The honorable thing to do would be for Clinton to resign -- this he will never do. But then neither would Nixon have -- if he had a 70% popularity rating in '74. It amazes me that Americans are so indifferent to a President who may have broken the law. I think that a solution would be for Clinton to hand power to Gore under the appropriate amendment, agree to go on trial on a expedited basis and if he is convicted resign--and if he is acquitted, he resumes as President.

To: jjs_ynot who wrote (5)	12/13/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 548

Dave, By your statement "I wish the case could have been made on one of these other issues". Doesn't it imply to people, you could be labeled as a person, that never wanted Clinton as President and one of those out to get him.. No offense, I said Could be. And thats what bothers so many people. Since they (Starr etal) could find no impeachable evidence in your "wish list" of offenses, Clinton's enemies grabbed and hung on to one that started somewhat suspiciously, the Tripp tapes.. Coug