Strictly Off Topic | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Strictly Off Topic

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
548	3	0

Emcee: Tom Trader	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

I am starting this thread so that participants can expound on a pot pourri of subjects that have nothing to do with the market.

The only rule that you need to follow (other than complying with SI's terms and conditions, which I need to read one of these days) is NOT to talk about market related issues.

However, if you feel an irresistible compulsion to comment about the market, stocks, futures, options please be courteous and start your post with a header that states "off topic" so that we can ignore your post, if we so choose.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
548	If you aren't going to post I'll have to remove you from my bookmarks ki	Patrick Slevin	-	3/26/2006
547	I'm following you now dude....i'm on your tail <GG>> btw...use	Stoctrash	-	1/19/2001
546	Scoot ... don't recall where or when I read/heard that speech, but it is st	Nemer	-	1/19/2001
545	This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth sharing. America: The Good Neighbor.	SE	-	1/19/2001
544	There are five towns named Paris in Texas? websearch.web.aol.com:80/plweb-cgi/f	Patrick Slevin	-	1/5/2001
543	If you do not hear from him let me know. I can call him. It may be that he has	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
542	Signed up for Dallas's site last week. Have not heard back from him. I was	SE	-	11/25/2000
541	<i>Wouldn't that be had?</i> You mean wouldn't that be <	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
540	Wasn't feeling too good this morning when I read it, heck, still am not...an	SE	-	11/25/2000
539	No, I meant my brother sent me that e-mail about the damn chicken. So I sent it	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
538	Thanks beans. However, I suspect that is the last we shall see of Mr. Hit and	SE	-	11/25/2000
537	I understand what you mean. <i>I'd rather that they ignore me, screw	SE	-	11/25/2000
536	The only guy I would ignore is Ground Hamburger. But I get a laugh out of his s	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
535	I didn't use to take advantage of it but since the election stuff I have rea	Nemer	-	11/25/2000
534	Lost the train of thought somehow, Message 14878009 <i>Took a minute aft	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
533	Took a minute after reading Scoot's post a responding to it that it dawned o	Patrick Slevin	-	11/25/2000
532	That's the one. Although I must say I have a favorite within the favorite,	Patrick Slevin	-	3/11/2000
531	Yeah, that could have been it.	Patrick Slevin	-	3/11/2000
530	You're thinking of "The Walrus and the Carpenter": The sun was s	Edwarda	-	3/11/2000
529	Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy	Edwarda	-	3/11/2000
528	Twas Brillig. I forget the rest. My favorite was the story about the Walrus,	Patrick Slevin	-	3/10/2000
527	He insisted that for it to be true Spam it would have to be posted on several t	Patrick Slevin	-	3/10/2000
526	Nope. A round of drinks. One fellow was even drinking that new trendy stuff...	Patrick Slevin	-	3/10/2000
525	the fib numbers say 146 is a good target, but I'm still hoping for the tril	Jorj X Mckie	-	3/10/2000
524	And aren't you quite the "peeping Tom"? ROFL! I'll quibble	Edwarda	-	3/10/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):