SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (19298)12/14/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 67261
 
Circumstantial evidence is much more valuable than eye witnesses. Ask any trial lawyer. The circumstantial case against the liar is air tight.

There is no way perjury by him can be proven because there is no witness to verify anything he is being charged with



To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (19298)12/14/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Please. Perjury is evident. One example. He denied being alone with Monica. Was Betty Currie watching him get those BJs? Hillary? There is no damage done to the Constitution by forcing a lying, perjuring, office abusing, justice obstructing individual from the WH. JLA



To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (19298)12/14/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The real damage is to the soul of our country in this attempt to justify open deceit on the pretense of the dependency of which you speak.

If we did not risk all anytime truth, justice, and freedom was in question; we would still be a nation sponsoring the industry of slavery.



To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (19298)12/14/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
You must be talking to the wrong people. The polls have 80 percent believing he perjured.