SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Brad who wrote (651)12/15/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Respond to of 28311
 
Hi Brad,
OOPS! Got caught complaining! I want you to know (which you already do) that SI is a great place. I spend 80% of my time here so it's an addiction and I experience withdrawal symptoms when I can't get more. <gg> I really do appreciate you guys and what you have made for us all. Have a good one, Bob

PS Thanks for the link. I will check it out. Have you met Bill yet? Since he's your neighbor. I hear that you can see his house from the moon. <gg>



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)12/15/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: Richard Karpel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
Brad: Is there a policy regarding the type of questions that GNET employees can answer on this thread? I'm just wondering why none of the questions that I ask ever receive a response. If there is a policy, and the questions that I have asked are not the type that you can answer, I will understand completely. Here they are:

Message 6622898
Message 6765024
Message 6765206

By the way, I happen to have a significant position in GNET. Significant for me, that is.



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)12/16/1998 9:35:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 28311
 
Like It or Not, Mutual Funds Are Buying Internet Stocks
By CHARLES GASPARINO
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Hyperactive individual investors have long dominated the world of Internet
stocks. But there is growing evidence that numerous mutual funds -- from
"specialty-technology" to plain-vanilla-sounding "mid-cap" growth funds --
have also bulked up on these shares in recent months.

This buying has helped to support the
stocks. But it could also mean trouble for
fund investors, if and when these zigzagging
stocks fall out of favor and the big investors
scramble to sell.

The issue of mainstream mutual funds dipping into Internet stocks was
recently hit home by Mary Meeker, a managing director at Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter and a top-ranked Internet stock analyst. Ms. Meeker
made a splash with a report that took issue with the notion that individuals
are the only players in the world of buying Internet stocks, attributing at
least part of a huge recent run-up in the price of Internet shares to money
managers who have "chased performance" in order to boost returns.

In an interview, Ms. Meeker says that underperformance by 90% of all
money managers has forced many to purchase Internet stocks, thus
boosting shares above and beyond their already lofty levels.

Statistics by Morningstar Inc., the Chicago-based mutual-fund information
company, lend credence to support Ms. Meeker's analysis: Over the past
six months, a number of mutual funds have shown significant increases in
the portion of their portfolio dedicated to shares of Yahoo! and
Amazon.com. Even some smaller Internet stocks, including
Books-A-Million and eBay, are showing up in fund portfolios, according
to Morningstar.

Take, for example, Bramwell Capital's flagship fund, Bramwell Growth.
Morningstar lists the fund as a "large growth" fund, while Elizabeth
Bramwell, president of Bramwell Capital Management, considers the fund
a "general growth fund."

Whatever the classification, the fund has been building up a position in
Amazon.com over the past five months or so, so that it now makes up just
under 1% of the portfolio. Should a fund of this type invest in highflying but
often unprofitable Internet companies?

Ms. Bramwell says the fund bought the stocks sometime last year, and
held on to them through the recent nose-bleeding rally, and has been
trimming the position so that it would remain under 1%. Despite the
Morningstar classification, she says she can buy whatever stock she wants
-- "I don't have any restrictions to be large, small, medium or whatever,"
she says.

"Having said that," she adds, "it's not like this is 5% of the portfolio."

But others are less enthusiastic about the whole Internet craze. Asked
about examples of mid-capitalization funds buying such stocks, veteran
investor Dick Strong says: "That sounds crazy; that's not us."

Mr. Strong, chairman of Strong Capital Management, Menomonee Falls,
Wis., says he is personally wary of the highly valued Internet stocks, based
on his experience of betting on other red-hot sectors that ultimately
cooled. "After you're kicked around a lot, you get a little more
conservative," he opines.

But Mr. Strong isn't averse to offering funds to investors with an Internet
flavor, as long as they are properly disclosed as such. In September,
Strong Capital, for example, launched Strong Enterprise Fund, an
aggressive growth fund that has 20% to 25% of its $7.5 million in Internet
shares, a spokeswoman says.

To be sure, fund managers who have snapped up Internet offerings don't
share the view that they are doing so because of a race to crank out
ever-higher returns. Several maintain their fund guidelines give them
latitude to invest in all kinds of stocks -- even those unprofitable Internet
names that have advanced mostly on future earnings' prospects (some
several years into the future, at best). Others defend their move into the
Internet as a good business decision, one that has benefited their
shareholders.

"I think its imprudent for a portfolio not to own these shares," says Abel
Garcia, portfolio manager for United Science & Technology Fund, offered
by Waddell & Reed Investment Management, Overland Park, Kan.

Mr. Garcia has about 6.6% of his portfolio in shares of Yahoo -- up from
about 2.57% around March. Mr. Garcia says the change is due not from
buying, but from market appreciation.

That said, he isn't bashful about owning so much of Yahoo. It is one of the
biggest Internet "portal" businesses, and he doesn't think it's out of place in
a fund that some might see as seemingly dedicated to more prosaic
"science and technology" stocks.

"These are the new companies, so if you don't own them you're dog meat
three or four years from now," Mr. Garcia says.



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)12/21/1998 12:28:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 28311
 
Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end? When And Why AMZN, YHOO, AOL, EBAY and CMGI will Fall.

The Prizes: $3,500 for describing why and an additional $1,500 if that same poster correctly predicts when the drop will occur. ($5,000 for both if predicted by the same entrant) See #Subject-24391 for details.



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)4/21/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
cOUSIN SHORTY says:

BRaD Adn JEFFREYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AAHA AHA AHA AH AHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

You Boys come on UP To the spacECARFT FOR Some TREATs!!!!!!!!!

cOUSIN SHORTY is BUYing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cOUSIN SHORTY



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)6/23/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: X Y Zebra  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 28311
 
Message 10214533

Instead, the word "banner" was inserted to specify that you would not see a "banner" ad (commonly accepted as a graphical intrusion taking up substantial screen real estate).

I have two questions:

1. How much does SI get for the advertising [that it is not a banner], from Datek?

[Maybe we, the members of SI can "buy out" the Datek advertisement]

If not....

2. Can you give me instructions so I can turn it off ?

[I mean, I don't like the ad, and although I never really had an opinion on Datek, I am beginning to hate it.... you know, the reverse psychology thing....]

And....

From a PM (which I sent to someone), who suggested I post this publicly

SI rate sheet:

go2net.com

Help me here please....

What the hell is the exact name of the "advertisement" [that it is not a banner].

So I can recognize it in the rate card....

My point of all this is, that if we are not going to convince SI that the Datek ad is not a banner, or that they should allow us to "turn it off", then, maybe we the members can buy it...

I briefly looked over the rate sheet... but without a specific name for the thing, I would have to spend a fair amount of time identifying which one is it.....

(At least, I am looking on the cheap side, so maybe more than NOT recognizing it, the problem is I DO NOT WANT to recognize it... <g>)

So give me a hint....and give me your thoughts.

Thanks.

Response:

Post this publicly

So there.....

_______________________

Oh and I found this too.....

Message 10196574

He, he, he, he, he, he.....

ZAP.....................



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)6/26/1999 6:14:00 PM
From: Urlman  Respond to of 28311
 
Brad I was curious about your thoughts on a web community based mutual fund...

latimes.com

-Url



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)9/8/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Tim Luke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
dear mr. dryer.

since your employee of the month si bob is side stepping my question i was hoping you could answer it in public here. i have already been contacted by someone in the press regarding myself,jenna,anthony elgindy and a few others here.

but my simple quest is as follows:

i have been on si just as long as jenna and i am also right up there with her as the most bookmarked and people marked on si (not that it's any thing to write home about) but i asked bob to change the header to my " no rest for the wicked " thread and he did. but he left out one thing and that was the link to my private web site that i'm building as we speak. timluke.com

now this is a private site for my picks only, it is not a posting or chat site so i'm not in competition with si...but for some reason he would not put it in....so here is my question....jenna over at market gems has 3 links to her sites , so why does she get away with this and i can't??....

i would like to know why there are double standards here on si . i can't get a straight answer out of si bob but then again he his a master at avoiding the subject.

i have brought countless PAYING members to this company over the last 3 years and i have help build si to what it is today and you know it...i have sent countless pm's to si bob with people telling me they joined so so they could post on my thread...so i hope you don't avoid this and finally explain to why jenna can advertise her site but people like tony elgindy and myself are not allowed to.

now if si bob gets the order to boot me off the si i will have my answer.

regards

tim luke



To: SI Brad who wrote (651)9/12/1999 6:20:00 PM
From: A@P Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
Explain why A@P was never allowed to have the link to his private site put on his main Dear Anthony thread ,but others like Jenna and Tim luke and a million others bombard us with their links and private sites, why are we forced to read in code Jenna's insepid rantings and we aren't allowed to have an equal forum? Why does GNET, not allow equal access to the Critic's of the hypesters? Tell us why?
Why won't SI admit they made a mistake?