SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yoav Chudnoff who wrote (19832)12/15/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<This entire proceeding will destroy the framework of the constitution by deforming the intent and meaning.>>

The framework of the constitution supports its intent and meaning wherein it establishes truth and justice as a standard for its citizenry. This proceeding is about truth and obstruction of justice and not who sleeps with who. It appears you place a high value on the latter and prefer to move the focus there, however.



To: Yoav Chudnoff who wrote (19832)12/15/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Good note.

The Republicans are ushering in a new millennium of divisive and dirty politics.

I'm hoping that, when the Democrats take back the Congress in 2000, they will take the high road and try and restore civility back to our democratic form of government.



To: Yoav Chudnoff who wrote (19832)12/15/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
And this at a time when some countries around the world are looking at the Presidential model of the US, because their Prime Ministers and governments are constantly getting replaced due to the "no confidence motions" that are brought in by the opposition parties for any reason (like shortage of onions in the market!) or even for no reason...



To: Yoav Chudnoff who wrote (19832)12/15/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
Simply absurd.



To: Yoav Chudnoff who wrote (19832)12/15/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Another total indiot....it's lying about it under oath. And by the way, here in America, you can take anyone to court for any reason. Getting past discovery and a grand jury might prove to be a little bit more difficult.

<<<<This entire proceeding will destroy the framework of the constitution by deforming the intent and meaning.>>>

Nothing like a left-wing wacko talking about the intent and meaning of the Constitution.

"Ok, class could anyone explain the Bill of Rights?"

Yoav: "I can! I can! Ok, the first amendment guarantees the freedom of pornography, the second amendment guarantees the right to arm bears, and duh third amendment it has somefin to do with renting out your house to a army man, and duh fourth amendment uhhh dat's about like uhh...uhhh..."