SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (24328)12/15/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116950
 
O'49er - I don't think the absence of a slander suit is any test for the veracity of an article. every week we see outrageous stories in tabloids which are rarely challenged. I knew someone in Montreal who used to write articles for a publication called 'Midnight' He completely fabricated his stories, often about Jackie and Onassis, etc.

The Mail and others are on pretty safe ground - it's highly unlikely that there will be slander suits - I'm not sure how often a sitting President has taken an action for slander or libel in any event..

I'm told, but am not sure, that the laws of slander/libel are very lax in the States. Talk show hosts seem to say slanderous things nearly every night in their monologues, yet are rarely sued E



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (24328)12/15/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116950
 
One shouldn't be surprised at a British newspaper dumping dirt on Clinton--he did what Bush and Reagan refused to do--give Jerry Adams, political wing of the IRA fame, a visa to enter the US to lobby in New York. (I'm for a united Ireland anyway.)

However to be fair to the British, it doesn't take a whole lot to find skeletons in Bill's closet, or interns for that matter. --Al