Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JAMES BORECKI who wrote (85500)	12/16/1998 1:20:00 AM
From: WeisbrichA	Respond to of 176387

-OT- This is about the Canadian version of clinton forgiveness ? Maybe the province weight master should come and adjust your scales. EH? We have over 100 recent (federal and not military) cases of prosecutions for perjury. Now how about the thousands of cases in the lower (state et. al.)courts and the military. And worldwide where English common law was the basis for government, how many more prosecutions? HOW many in your own Provincial Government? Mounties don't look the other way. You should be proud of that! RW

To: JAMES BORECKI who wrote (85500)	12/16/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

~OT~ In reality, we can all spin this matter in a way which best suits our argument. I believe myself to be a purist in my interpretation of the law, and the enforcement of it. In reducing the whole matter to its most germane form, I see it as perjury, and as perjury irrespective of any context. If the chief law enforcement officer of the country cannot be held accountable for obeying all laws, then why should anyone else? I think the House is doing the right thing, and if it ends with the Senate not expelling WJC from office, then so be it. The rule of law would've been upheld. To not go through the motions of attempting to uphold the rule of law, no matter how futile, would be a travesty. I don't ever remember reading about polls and town hall meetings in the Constitution. Just my opinion. LoD